Some test

Get feedback from others on your works in progress
Post Reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
Xman
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Guangdong-China

Some test

Post by Xman » Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:47 pm

long time no see everyone. :D

Honored to see so much progress in Indigo2.0,This is my spare time doing the test.
Indigo 2.0 is very good.I love it. :D
Attachments
Untitled-scene9.jpg
yu
Untitled-scene9.jpg (186.45 KiB) Viewed 3128 times
Untitled-sceneLED.jpg
LED
Untitled-sceneLED.jpg (182.87 KiB) Viewed 3130 times
bosi-scene.jpg
bo
bosi-scene.jpg (295.37 KiB) Viewed 3129 times
Intel i7-920,RAM 3G ,GeForce 9800GTX+.

User avatar
Doug Armand
Indigo 100
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 5:49 pm
Location: London UK

Re: Some test

Post by Doug Armand » Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:01 pm

Some very nice stuff there - I like the 2nd and 3rd images the most
Doug

Doug Armand

User avatar
dcm
Posts: 663
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:55 am

Re: Some test

Post by dcm » Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:48 am

ah...indigo vs. glass. not friends :)

User avatar
galinette
1st Place Winner
Posts: 923
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Nantes, France
Contact:

Re: Some test

Post by galinette » Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:52 am

ah...indigo vs. glass. not friends :)
That's not true!! Glass is not easy to render but MLT renderers (hence Indigo) are the best for this

Xman : did you enable MLT for rendering the LED?

Etienne
Eclat-Digital Research
http://www.eclat-digital.com

User avatar
dcm
Posts: 663
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:55 am

Re: Some test

Post by dcm » Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:54 am

i love indigo but i think glass is the hardest part for indigo from all unbiased renderers i have ever tried :roll:

User avatar
Xman
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Guangdong-China

Re: Some test

Post by Xman » Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:33 pm

galinette wrote:
ah...indigo vs. glass. not friends :)
That's not true!! Glass is not easy to render but MLT renderers (hence Indigo) are the best for this

Xman : did you enable MLT for rendering the LED?

Etienne

I'm use Pathtrace+Bid,I guess that would be better to use MLT. :D
Intel i7-920,RAM 3G ,GeForce 9800GTX+.

User avatar
galinette
1st Place Winner
Posts: 923
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Nantes, France
Contact:

Re: Some test

Post by galinette » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:40 pm

MLT is really mandatory for the LED scene I think.

I'm currently working on 5 floor buildings with more than 90 double glazing units (two superimposed glass sheets per windows). I think Indigo is coping very well with that kind of scene.

Etienne
Eclat-Digital Research
http://www.eclat-digital.com

User avatar
Xman
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Guangdong-China

Re: Some test

Post by Xman » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:07 pm

I feel slower MLT,So, I seldom use MLT.
Intel i7-920,RAM 3G ,GeForce 9800GTX+.

User avatar
galinette
1st Place Winner
Posts: 923
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Nantes, France
Contact:

Re: Some test

Post by galinette » Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:08 pm

There are some bright dots inside your LED. These are likely some multireflections/caustics that converge really slowly without MLT. Try again with MLT and you will likely see a quite different result there. PT seems faster but id did not rendered yet some features of the image.

Etienne
Eclat-Digital Research
http://www.eclat-digital.com

Soup
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:20 am

Re: Some test

Post by Soup » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:37 am

dcm wrote:i love indigo but i think glass is the hardest part for indigo from all unbiased renderers i have ever tried :roll:
Could you elaborate on your experience dcm? Maybe we can improve it! :)

The orange figure is out of focus, I think it'd look nice in focus ;) I love the red balls though, really nice reflections.

Post Reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest