This is what I use Indigo for

Stinkie · Post by **Stinkie** » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:01 am

Thanks. I like that one myself. Indigo did a good job translating what I had in mind on to the screen.

Now I gotta try sss. That may prove interesting.

zeitmeister · Post by **zeitmeister** » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:57 pm

Very cool images... never seen archviz like that before. Dark, mystic... congrats to that!

Stinkie · Post by **Stinkie** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:26 am

Thanks. Here's two more.

Everyone okay with me just adding to this thread? Keeps things tidy, IMO.

dakiru · Post by **dakiru** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:28 am

Super! That second thing - what is it?

Stinkie · Post by **Stinkie** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:47 am

It's a building. Here's a bit of an earlier (Maxwell) render I did of it.

dakiru · Post by **dakiru** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:59 am

Stinkie wrote:It's a building. Here's a bit of an earlier (Maxwell) render I did of it.

Looks good

Doug Armand · Post by **Doug Armand** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:59 am

I really like your stuff.

Has a nice naturally lit photographic look to it.

Excellent stuff. Would love to see more

suvakas · Post by **suvakas** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:47 am

Very cool stuff Stinkie.
This kind of lighting is also where unbiased beats biased. Would be hard to get images without artifacts with biased approach.

Stinkie · Post by **Stinkie** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:04 am

Doug Armand wrote:Has a nice naturally lit photographic look to it.

And to think I always failed photography back in high school and at the Academy of Fine Arts. Never managed to take a decent pic.

suvakas wrote:This kind of lighting is also where unbiased beats biased.

I've noticed. I tried my best to reproduce these using Vray (for SketchUp, that is), but I failed quite miserably. Obviously that isn't entirely Vray's fault.

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:30 am

And to think I always failed photography back in high school and at the Academy of Fine Arts. Never managed to take a decent pic.

Could be because you have your very own style pixie, and such a thing is precious. All precious things are not readily accessible to everyone, it took myself some time to be sure you were not joking... now I agree to call that art.

Stinkie · Post by **Stinkie** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:38 am

Nah - I really do suck at taking photographs. I don't understand the first thing about camera's. My teachers/professors were quite right in failing me!

Stop calling me Pixie.

Pibuz · Post by **Pibuz** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:43 am

Come on: you don't suck pixie.

(LOL)

dakiru · Post by **dakiru** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:49 am

Pibuz wrote:Come on: you don't suck pixie.

(LOL)

Hey, Pibuz, reconsider the sentence, because I understood it... ehm... not quite good. Maybe it's just my bad English

pixie · Post by **pixie** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:54 am

Stinkie wrote:Stop calling me Pixie.

C'mon... what's wrong with you pixie, don't like your name anymore?

Post by **OnoSendai** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:34 am

Love the two new images Stinkie.

This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Re: This is what I use Indigo for

Who is online