F-stop and linear tonemapping
F-stop and linear tonemapping
I've made lot of test and I don't understand why but F-stop and linear tonemapping give change tonemapping!? Is it right?
- Attachments
-
- fstop 64.jpg (109.73 KiB) Viewed 4601 times
-
- fstop 32.jpg (186.13 KiB) Viewed 4601 times
-
- fstop 8.jpg (100.71 KiB) Viewed 4600 times
-
- Capture 2.JPG (114.85 KiB) Viewed 4600 times
-
- Capture 1.JPG (114.2 KiB) Viewed 4601 times
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
its correct. the lower the fstop the more light will reach the film 
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
Thanksfused wrote:its correct. the lower the fstop the more light will reach the film
- PureSpider
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
- Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
- Contact:
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
But it hasn't been like that in older releases of indigo. What about not changing random stuff without letting the user know, Ono? 
- pixie

- Posts: 2346
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:54 am
- Location: Away from paradise
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
- Contact:
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
If it wasn't as such before, it was wrong, therefore changing to right can only be the right thing to doPureSpider wrote:But it hasn't been like that in older releases of indigo. What about not changing random stuff without letting the user know, Ono?
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
of course it was like that before. it has always been like that 
- PureSpider
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
- Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
- Contact:
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
Sooooo... Cindigo compensates the changed F-Stop? o.O
My pics never changed their brightness when I changed the F-Stop!
My pics never changed their brightness when I changed the F-Stop!
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
Tonemapping (other than linear) masks the change of illumination, I suppose.
Edit: Camera tonemapping without auto exposure (and no manual exposure adjustment) should not compensate.
Edit: Camera tonemapping without auto exposure (and no manual exposure adjustment) should not compensate.
Last edited by Josh on Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
probably because you used reinhard 
- PureSpider
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
- Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
- Contact:
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
Just checked - and yes, I do use Reinhard in that scene I was talking about 
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
Hey Jambert, I think the topic deserves a complement of information, but I am no expert in the field, hopefully my says will be also completed or corrected if necessary.
F-stop is an inverse value (1/n) wich refers to the width of the aperture for the shutter. Obviously, the bigger the divider n, the smaller the aperture.
F-stop = divider of aperture = divider of luminosity
Q: Is it correct to say that an F-stop of 32 means that the shutter aperture is 1/32th of its widest possible aperture?
F-stop is an inverse value (1/n) wich refers to the width of the aperture for the shutter. Obviously, the bigger the divider n, the smaller the aperture.
F-stop = divider of aperture = divider of luminosity
Q: Is it correct to say that an F-stop of 32 means that the shutter aperture is 1/32th of its widest possible aperture?
obsolete asset
Re: F-stop and linear tonemapping
Not quite, it means that the aperture is 1/32 of the focal length.... which is why low f-number telephoto lenses (large focal length) are expensive and massive - because the glass needs to be bigger.CTZn wrote:Q: Is it correct to say that an F-stop of 32 means that the shutter aperture is 1/32th of its widest possible aperture?
