WIPs: CTZn
Re: WIPs: CTZn
more like this. As it came out the maths were correct but the effect was just bad.
Not sure what the banding is, but I can make it worse...
Not sure what the banding is, but I can make it worse...
obsolete asset
Re: WIPs: CTZn
so cool 

- pixie
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:54 am
- Location: Away from paradise
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
- Contact:
Re: WIPs: CTZn
Thats tha shit!CTZn wrote:more like this. As it came out the maths were correct but the effect was just bad.
Not sure what the banding is, but I can make it worse...

Re: WIPs: CTZn
Stepping artifacts are probably due to step_size being too large btw.
Re: WIPs: CTZn
yep they were. Maybe it's too small now... A short serie from the shader featuring a couple parameters. Sorry all are 25 spp only.
obsolete asset
Re: WIPs: CTZn

Some delay with maya ... hope than in few days we could see it in scale.
Silent edit: glad to hear that ...

Last edited by yonosoy on Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
Re: WIPs: CTZn
Maya is optional, the shader is scalable. New version, before only the top part of the clouds was shaped, here both top and bottom have a shaping of 50%, leading to "round clouds" sort of. Plain default, average shader values, no tweaking.
I am going to render someting bigger and with more spp's
I am going to render someting bigger and with more spp's

obsolete asset
Re: WIPs: CTZn
WOW, this is simply stunning!!!
Is it possible to use this shader as volume noise for arch viz on plane scenes, or is this only usable on earth-scaled scenes.
Would love to test it in a huge scaled cube flying above an arch viz scene
best regards!
Markus
Is it possible to use this shader as volume noise for arch viz on plane scenes, or is this only usable on earth-scaled scenes.
Would love to test it in a huge scaled cube flying above an arch viz scene

best regards!
Markus
C4D R20 Studio
mad-imagery.com
mad-imagery.com
Re: WIPs: CTZn
Hey Mor4us hi, thank you !
Yes sure, you just tick the 'Box' parameter in both the absorbtion and scattering editors and you can set the top height and clouds layer depth in the respective shaders, toward the beginning of the code. The box shader uses the world ground as reference (at a height of zero meter).
It's real !
The one thing I forgot to expose is the very clouds scaling. It is the float value below (0.10), call it frequency. Smaller value = larger clouds.
Mind you, I'm pretty happy wth the result since that's the only noise used in the shader. There's room for more randesomness !
Last but not least with the clouds frequency must one change both teminal multiplier for the shaders, namely 0.3 and 50.0. They're set against 10m wide clouds really.
Yes sure, you just tick the 'Box' parameter in both the absorbtion and scattering editors and you can set the top height and clouds layer depth in the respective shaders, toward the beginning of the code. The box shader uses the world ground as reference (at a height of zero meter).
It's real !
The one thing I forgot to expose is the very clouds scaling. It is the float value below (0.10), call it frequency. Smaller value = larger clouds.
Code: Select all
# some low frequency noise
noize = fbm01(pos * 0.10 , 8)
Last but not least with the clouds frequency must one change both teminal multiplier for the shaders, namely 0.3 and 50.0. They're set against 10m wide clouds really.
- Attachments
-
- clouds over sphere off-scale test.ma.zip
- The Maya scene. Scattering and absorbtion parameters are driven by the indigoShader's params so use the later for tweaking.
- (16.57 KiB) Downloaded 626 times
-
- clouds over sphere off-scale test.pigs
- The Indigo scene.
The planet has a radius of 40m, the atmosphere of 51m but the upper shader limit is set to 50m (from center), with a cloud layer height of 5m (starting 5m above ground). - (2.81 KiB) Downloaded 688 times
obsolete asset
Re: WIPs: CTZn
wow, thanks for the files... but this reaaaally renders slow as fuck 
6 SPP in 1hour......
why is that?

6 SPP in 1hour......
why is that?
C4D R20 Studio
mad-imagery.com
mad-imagery.com
Re: WIPs: CTZn
That's the way it is, better off rendering at a small resolution with no supersampling for speed 
You can try increasing the medium step size (double it) but steping artifacts will only be more visible.
Also it may enhance performance to scale the clouds sphere to the minimum required.
Lastly rendering a portion of the clouds within a box would be much faster than for the whole sphere.
I'm open to suggestions.

You can try increasing the medium step size (double it) but steping artifacts will only be more visible.
Also it may enhance performance to scale the clouds sphere to the minimum required.
Lastly rendering a portion of the clouds within a box would be much faster than for the whole sphere.
I'm open to suggestions.
obsolete asset
Re: WIPs: CTZn
Awesome shader!
Re: WIPs: CTZn
Also the scattering value of 50.0 might be too much, lower value may suffice and converge faster. Inversely, increasing the absorbtion factor will kill more rays and make faster, darker clouds.
Here's what I've got at 34 spp; power 2.0, offset -0.125, shape shift 0.25. What shape shift does is larger clouds, toward their base or toward their summit for low and high values respectively. 0.5 is for the so called round clouds.
Here's what I've got at 34 spp; power 2.0, offset -0.125, shape shift 0.25. What shape shift does is larger clouds, toward their base or toward their summit for low and high values respectively. 0.5 is for the so called round clouds.
obsolete asset
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests