General questions about Indigo, the scene format, rendering etc...
-
STS
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:10 am
- Location: Finland
Post
by STS » Wed May 30, 2007 1:12 am
Hello Indigo users!
I'm quite new to Indigo renderer and I use Blender to model & export my scenes. I started a simple dice scene and thought to give those dices some SSS. I have Indigo 0.8 stable and I use
Blender to Indigo exporter script. I had to edit the .igs file for the SSS effect. Here is the material for the glass of the dice:
Code: Select all
<medium>
<name>glass</name>
<basic>
<ior>1.5</ior>
<cauchy_b_coeff>0.0</cauchy_b_coeff>
<absorption_coefficient_spectrum>
<rgb>
<rgb>15 90 128</rgb>
</rgb>
</absorption_coefficient_spectrum>
<subsurface_scattering>
<scattering_coefficient_spectrum>
<uniform>
<value>15</value>
</uniform>
</scattering_coefficient_spectrum>
<phase_function>
<uniform/>
</phase_function>
</subsurface_scattering>
</basic>
</medium>
<material>
<name>Dice</name>
<specular>
<transparent>true</transparent>
<internal_medium_name>glass</internal_medium_name>
</specular>
</material>
I Find it strange that the render has really awful artifacts around the dice edges. Here is the result after over 12h rendering
(on my AMD Athlon 64 3200+, 2GB Ram). Jaggedness of the edges haven't changed at all in this time.
This is the used dice mesh.
I would like to know that is it really taking so long to get nicer results or what is the problem? Also there seems to be no noticeable SSS effect. Is that material setting all wrong or what?
I have had successful renders with non transparent materials
(this is my first try with that glass material).
Thanks..
-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Wed May 30, 2007 1:18 am
definately looks like supersampling factor beyond 1
try supersampling factor 2 or 2

It's the antialiasing value.
-
Stur
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:52 pm
- Location: Nancy, France
Post
by Stur » Wed May 30, 2007 1:19 am
Hi STS, and welcome !
It looks like if you had 2 surfaces overlaping each other no the first picture.
What did you hand edited exactly on the .igs file ? Maybe it's the key to what is wrong

-
manitwo
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:50 am
- Location: Tirol - Austria
Post
by manitwo » Wed May 30, 2007 2:52 am
Kram1032 wrote:definately looks like supersampling factor beyond 1
try supersampling factor 2 or 2

It's the antialiasing value.

please tell me that was a joke
@STS: really strange - never saw such artefacts with indigo. does it render correctly if you use a diffuse for example? is the scale of the dice correct?
-
OnoSendai

- Posts: 6243
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
- Location: Wellington, NZ
-
Contact:
Post
by OnoSendai » Wed May 30, 2007 3:02 am
Looks like some kind of displacement map error. Are you using a displacement map?
-
Whaat

- Posts: 1827
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:15 am
- Location: Canada
-
Contact:
Post
by Whaat » Wed May 30, 2007 3:46 am
I have had this problem, too. But, I am not sure of the cause. I don't believe it has anything to do with material settings or super sample settings.
This problem has arose for me when I was rendering an object using sunlight and the background is very bright. It might also be because the the scale of the model is too large. I think the problem is magnified when the model scale is huge.
Try rendering the same scene with meshlights and a different background to test my theory.
-
Attachments
-

- No SSS, just diffuse materials with sunlight (no background)
- car.JPG (348.29 KiB) Viewed 4646 times
-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Wed May 30, 2007 4:27 am
Or simply make the model smaller?
If it's
magnified when the model scale is huge.
It could be a floatingpoint error...
But I don't think, these cubes are, like, 10000 m (= 10000 BU) big, lol
Otherwise, the SS and the absorbtion both would be much too much...
Someone once posted simmilarish problems, where it was supersampling, if I remember correctly...
-
psor

- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:25 am
- Location: Berlin
-
Contact:
Post
by psor » Wed May 30, 2007 5:07 am
C'mon guys, ... you're just testing the new realtime preview!
take care
psor
"The sleeper must awaken"
-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Wed May 30, 2007 5:47 am
hum....
if that#S the preview, I'd actually like to have less biasedness instead of 20x20 pixels.

-
STS
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:10 am
- Location: Finland
Post
by STS » Wed May 30, 2007 6:18 am
Hmm.. actually those dice are quite small.. like 0.03 blender units
(i think it translates to 3 centimeters, which is rather big for a dice thou). Also I noticed that without thinking I had subdivided those
way too much
(erhm.. actually those dice have 81000 faces!). I don't know if that causes those strange errors.
No I don't use displacement maps and increasing supersampling doesn't help.
I have uploaded the .igs file here if someone want's to look at it:
http://uploader.polorix.net//files/393/Jagged_dice.zip
I also tried
other exporter for blender and didn't subdivide those dice so much.. now it's coming out nicely.. this is what I got only after 15 - 20 minutes:

-
CTZn
- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
- Location: Paris, France
Post
by CTZn » Wed May 30, 2007 12:34 pm
Beta adaptative sampling issue

I mean have you never talked about something similar, Ono ? Or maybe that's me...
obsolete asset
-
STS
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:10 am
- Location: Finland
Post
by STS » Wed May 30, 2007 4:54 pm
CTZn wrote:Beta adaptative sampling issue

I mean have you never talked about something similar, Ono ? Or maybe that's me...
What's that? *going to look it up*
radiance wrote:hmmm, I did'nt know indigo ran on a commodore 64 ???

Maybe not on C64 but surely on
new commodores..

-
CTZn
- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
- Location: Paris, France
Post
by CTZn » Thu May 31, 2007 4:19 am
STS wrote:CTZn wrote:Beta adaptative sampling issue

I mean have you never talked about something similar, Ono ? Or maybe that's me...
What's that? *going to look it up*
I think I've read Ono telling he ehanced the edge anti-aliasing code but I'm not certain of that...
obsolete asset
-
cpfresh
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:20 pm
- Location: California, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by cpfresh » Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:24 pm
I've had similar results when rendering a structure on a large terrain model. Once I remove the terrain mesh, the problem goes away. Now I haven't tested to see whether it is the texture I've applied to the terrain mesh or the mesh itself, but I assume it may be either one of those things causing the problem.
edit:
Well i did some more experimenting with removing all the textures from the large mesh (~17,000 polygons) and still got the strange artifacts in the rendering. Then I went ahead and removed the mesh all together but it was still producing the same effect. So now I don't know what could be wrong, I guess my file is goofed some how, or maybe my modeling software! (SU 6) Dunno.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests