Simple Renderings Thread
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Hi Oscar,
while I am currently not earning money with CG but this may change in the future, I am looking for a render engine that suits my requirements. At the moment I got an indigo 3 license but I think that the exporter development not that good, (I am mainly working with Sketchup and Blender). For that reason I am looking at other Engines like Octane. Maybe there will be some changes in the future development of the exporters. I would wish for Indigo that the new blender exporter will be as good as the luxrender one for example. For the Sketchup plugin I think the developers should have a look at sketchup plugin for thearender, maybe with the new GPU rendermode its possible to have a sort of interactive rendering?
while I am currently not earning money with CG but this may change in the future, I am looking for a render engine that suits my requirements. At the moment I got an indigo 3 license but I think that the exporter development not that good, (I am mainly working with Sketchup and Blender). For that reason I am looking at other Engines like Octane. Maybe there will be some changes in the future development of the exporters. I would wish for Indigo that the new blender exporter will be as good as the luxrender one for example. For the Sketchup plugin I think the developers should have a look at sketchup plugin for thearender, maybe with the new GPU rendermode its possible to have a sort of interactive rendering?
Intel Pentium 4, 512MB Ram, Nvidia Riva TNT2 Ultra
Instagram: gorilla_studio_coco
Instagram: gorilla_studio_coco
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
png too big
converted to jpg
indigo jpg output borked, 5 bands for a sky
converted to jpg
indigo jpg output borked, 5 bands for a sky
obsolete asset
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
For some reason, Indigo 4.0.30 came with jpg quality set to 1% out of the box... try it out it's funny !CTZn wrote:indigo jpg output borked, 5 bands for a sky
obsolete asset
- juan_irender
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
- Location: Spain
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
Simple Renderings Thread
Hi all.
A try with fast SSS material in Indigo 4.0.x. About 2 hour rendering in PT.
Hope you like it.
A try with fast SSS material in Indigo 4.0.x. About 2 hour rendering in PT.
Hope you like it.
C4D R18 Studio user
Blender user
Blender user

- Oscar J
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:47 am
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- 3D Software: Blender
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Love it. 

- juan_irender
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
- Location: Spain
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Looks funny ! Also, I think this is the cleanest such render I have ever seen from Indigo ! Was it post-processed ?
obsolete asset
- juan_irender
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
- Location: Spain
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Hi, CTZn!
Post-processing needed with this pic was small: a very little amount of fireflies were present, after 2 hours of rendering, only very light Photoshop work was needed. I´m happy with this new Indigo material. Next I wish is a proper hair rendering primitive
.
Post-processing needed with this pic was small: a very little amount of fireflies were present, after 2 hours of rendering, only very light Photoshop work was needed. I´m happy with this new Indigo material. Next I wish is a proper hair rendering primitive

C4D R18 Studio user
Blender user
Blender user

-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 11:34 am
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
yes! been wanting that for a whilejuan_irender wrote:... Next I wish is a proper hair rendering primitive.
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Where can I find this model?juan_irender wrote:Hi all.
A try with fast SSS material in Indigo 4.0.x. About 2 hour rendering in PT.
Hope you like it.
Thank you
Mac Mini 2011 - 2,3 GHz Intel Core i5
16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 - Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 Mb.
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB - MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
https://www.behance.net/Paolo_Conti
16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 - Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 Mb.
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB - MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
https://www.behance.net/Paolo_Conti
- pixie
- Posts: 2345
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:54 am
- Location: Away from paradise
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
- Contact:
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Blendercontegufo wrote:Where can I find this model?juan_irender wrote:Hi all.
A try with fast SSS material in Indigo 4.0.x. About 2 hour rendering in PT.
Hope you like it.
Thank you
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
A dirty trick for clean images / firefly suppression is simply to use high supersampling values, like 4-8. It can take a bit longer to reach normal brightness but actually works quite well (and doesn't require any extra GPU memory).juan_irender wrote:Hi, CTZn!
Post-processing needed with this pic was small: a very little amount of fireflies were present, after 2 hours of rendering, only very light Photoshop work was needed. I´m happy with this new Indigo material.
- juan_irender
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
- Location: Spain
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Hi Contegufo: the monkey is a Blender primitive, called Suzanne.contegufo wrote: Where can I find this model?
Thank you
C4D R18 Studio user
Blender user
Blender user

- juan_irender
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
- Location: Spain
- 3D Software: Cinema 4D
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Nice tip, Lycium, I´ll try...lycium wrote: A dirty trick for clean images / firefly suppression is simply to use high supersampling values, like 4-8. It can take a bit longer to reach normal brightness but actually works quite well (and doesn't require any extra GPU memory).
C4D R18 Studio user
Blender user
Blender user

- Oscar J
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:47 am
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- 3D Software: Blender
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Barely a minute of rendering on GPU, the speed is quite nice.
Also I have noted that the new filmic tonemapper is very very good for arch viz - it doesn't burn out the whites easily, so you can go quite bright to boost the mid range.
Also I have noted that the new filmic tonemapper is very very good for arch viz - it doesn't burn out the whites easily, so you can go quite bright to boost the mid range.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 211 guests