V2.03 Vs. 1.1.18

For all Indigo users.
Post Reply
9 posts • Page 1 of 1
Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

V2.03 Vs. 1.1.18

Post by Rafaello » Sun May 03, 2009 9:25 am

Well I have some test results with a core 2 quad Q6660 4 Gb Ram:

Indigo 2.03 10 hours 20 minutes 4,236 samples/s

Image



Indigo 1.1.18 10 hours 12 minutes 142,075 samples/s

Image

for me 2.03 is too slower

User avatar
Zom-B
1st Place 100
Posts: 4636
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
Contact:

Re: V2.03 Vs. 1.1.18

Post by Zom-B » Sun May 03, 2009 9:46 am

This are some hard Numbers Rafaello and even harder images :(

For me the 64 bit Build was about 13% slower on a quick 100 spp test, maybe the 32bit build is more evil here?!

Afaik Ono did a bunch of SSE related optimizations for the 2.xx build... maybe something went terribly wrong there! Since Ono is on a 64bit Vista too, he maybe don't recognized this...

More Benchmarks would be nice here guys, keep them coming!
polygonmanufaktur.de

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Re: V2.03 Vs. 1.1.18

Post by Rafaello » Sun May 03, 2009 10:08 am

I work in Xp 64 and feel so sad either, I hope Ono and Benn can think about continue the developement of 1.1.18 for the commercial purposes aswell, I think everyone want great images in less time.
I don't know about speed and quality in simple scenes, this one has nearly 8 million vertices.

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6171
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Contact:

Re: V2.03 Vs. 1.1.18

Post by OnoSendai » Sun May 03, 2009 11:53 am

Hi Rafaello,
Can you send me the scene so I can analyse it?
How big is the scene in MB?
If it's smaller than 5MB you could send it to nick@indigorenderer.com
thanks.

Guest

Post by Guest » Sun May 03, 2009 4:56 pm

Sorry Ono the files of the igs scene are 91 Mb big and the C4D scene is 99 Mb, so I can't send you the files by email. I will try to upload the files to rapidshare monday morning (here in México).

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Post by Rafaello » Sun May 03, 2009 5:00 pm

I don't know why the last post appeared as guest, the post is mine. I will make some tests with a little light scene an will tell you what happens.

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6171
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Contact:

Re: V2.03 Vs. 1.1.18

Post by OnoSendai » Mon May 04, 2009 2:39 pm

Hi Rafaello,
Yup, it would be great if you could upload the file to rapidshare or something similar, like http://drop.io/

Thanks!

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6171
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Contact:

Re: V2.03 Vs. 1.1.18

Post by OnoSendai » Sun May 10, 2009 2:31 pm

This bug was fixed in version 2.0.5, thanks for bug report Rafaello!

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Post by Rafaello » Sun May 10, 2009 3:03 pm

Happy to be usefull :wink:

Post Reply
9 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest