Show off your final renders
-
Godzilla

- Posts: 985
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:33 am
Post
by Godzilla » Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:25 am
Click for dA
Also, as a test, I rendered these scenes in both Indigo 1.1.18 (What you see) and 2.0.8 for a few minutes, figured out the SPP/s, then determined that Indigo 2.0.8 is actually about 40% faster than 1.1.18.

-
OnoSendai

- Posts: 6243
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
- Location: Wellington, NZ
-
Contact:
Post
by OnoSendai » Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:01 pm
1.1.18 Also has some issues with specular materials + bidir IIRC, so 2.0.8 might be a better bet.
-
Godzilla

- Posts: 985
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:33 am
Post
by Godzilla » Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:22 pm
Going to buy a license soon, I promise

-
Stromberg
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:01 am
- Location: Norway
-
Contact:
Post
by Stromberg » Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:01 pm
Sure looks great

Simple and clean render, those i like best
Good to hear that 2.0.8 is faster

-
zeitmeister

- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:11 am
- Location: Limburg/Lahn, Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by zeitmeister » Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:55 am
Beautiful!
Did you use a cauchy-coefficient value in you glass materials?
-
Godzilla

- Posts: 985
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:33 am
Post
by Godzilla » Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:53 am
zeitmeister wrote:Beautiful!
Did you use a cauchy-coefficient value in you glass materials?
Yes, 0.1, which I think is rather high

-
lycium
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:46 am
- Location: Leipzig, Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by lycium » Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:24 pm
OnoSendai wrote:1.1.18 Also has some issues with specular materials + bidir IIRC, so 2.0.8 might be a better bet.
iirc the major change with 1.1.18 was to fix these specular/bidir issues?
edit: checked, seems to be the case.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests