V 2.05

For all Indigo users.
Post Reply
14 posts • Page 1 of 1
Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

V 2.05

Post by Rafaello » Sat May 09, 2009 3:01 am

Hi, seems like Ono optimize the code in this version because it now works almost as fast as 1.1.18 test scene with 144,000 samples/s :D

Stromberg
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:01 am
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: V 2.05

Post by Stromberg » Sun May 10, 2009 1:05 am

Good to hear :D
Cause with a new version, i would expect it to be faster, but some might go the other way around :wink:

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Post by Rafaello » Sun May 10, 2009 5:51 am

Yes Stromberg, that is what I expect either, I am happy now because I used the same scene of this topic http://www.indigorenderer.com/forum/vie ... =27&t=5771 and ... :D :D :D

Stromberg
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:01 am
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: V 2.05

Post by Stromberg » Sun May 10, 2009 5:58 am

Hopefully indigo will get even faster :wink:

User avatar
benn
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:47 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: V 2.05

Post by benn » Sun May 10, 2009 1:25 pm

Heh - Nick told me what he fixed that was causing the super-lame slowdown - but I forget what he said. ;D

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Post by Rafaello » Sun May 10, 2009 3:11 pm

Don't worry Ben, I would like that you can check this strange shadows they don't appear in 1.1.18
Attachments
Test205.png
Test205.png (921.15 KiB) Viewed 8837 times

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: V 2.05

Post by CTZn » Sun May 17, 2009 10:27 pm

Hi Rafaello,

The issue seems to be related with scene geometry rather than being real shadows. It is highly probable that this geometric issue is solely related with that scene; did you experience the issue within another scene ? Aren't the strokes related with the actual pillar triangulation (can we see a wireframe of the geomety please) ?

Try to redo that portion of the scene (the pillars) and render it again. Also you could remove all objects from the scene but the faulty geometry, in order to check better what is going on.

But replacing the pillars with two new elongated cubes should be the best way to go.
obsolete asset

Stromberg
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:01 am
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: V 2.05

Post by Stromberg » Mon May 18, 2009 1:04 am

I think it's the geometry myself, i have had some problems like that to, and it was defently my bad
triangulated model :P
Try to make the mesh cleaner like CTZn said :)

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Post by Rafaello » Wed May 20, 2009 11:30 am

Thank you both, I melt the triangles in a mesh and everything Ok, but in another scene I have to triangulate a mesh to make it work, so I'm confuse and I think the problem is in Indigo, because with the 2.02, 2.03 and 2.04 versions I had no problem with the same scene.

neo0.
Posts: 1784
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:11 am
Location: the US of A

Re: V 2.05

Post by neo0. » Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:39 pm

Man, that is a really great looking scene. I can't wait until Blender 2.5 goes live, so I can finally get back into modelling. :)

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Re:

Post by PureSpider » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:50 pm

Rafaello wrote:Thank you both, I melt the triangles in a mesh and everything Ok, but in another scene I have to triangulate a mesh to make it work, so I'm confuse and I think the problem is in Indigo, because with the 2.02, 2.03 and 2.04 versions I had no problem with the same scene.
Got that problems on a scene of mine recently, too.
Definitely not a problem of our geometry as 1.1.18 works just fine with it!

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Post by Rafaello » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:00 pm

Hi PureSpider, seems that this forum has been left behind, so, why don't you post this in the new forum? there is a post related to it, but I don't promise you an answer :(

User avatar
benn
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:47 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: V 2.05

Post by benn » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:53 pm

We still read this forum. I think the new build fixes this bug (I remember nick working on it) - so it might be fixed later today. :)

Ben

Rafaello
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Guanajuato, México

Post by Rafaello » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:37 am

Good to hear of it benn, I thought that here was the place to comment about our tests of the betas and still think it, but seems that a lot of members prefer to do it in the news forum.

Post Reply
14 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests