XYZ images, alternate displays ... conjecture
XYZ images, alternate displays ... conjecture
I've had a thought that as indigo supports peak emitters (specify wavelength of the light), wouldn't it be cool if there was a display device that could actually emit all the way up to UltraViolet, so as to make full use of this feature ?
I'm currently rendering an image in UV (peak 450nm, width 25nm), and it's coming out in patches on saturated blue and magenta on my screen
I'd love to be able to see it in all it's violet glory.
I'm currently rendering an image in UV (peak 450nm, width 25nm), and it's coming out in patches on saturated blue and magenta on my screen
I'd love to be able to see it in all it's violet glory.
isn't the fluorescence effect with UV light indeed fluorescence? - if so, you wont get the effect, you want
and as long as it's very noisy, you wont be able to see, if it works as expected, either
y'know what?
post two (or more) pics:
1) How it currently looks
2) Which effect you want
That would make it easier
and as long as it's very noisy, you wont be able to see, if it works as expected, either
y'know what?
post two (or more) pics:
1) How it currently looks
2) Which effect you want
That would make it easier
no, i'm not trying to render the effect - i was just musing about how it'd be cool if there was a monitor that could emit UV light. (or - having just read wikipedia - a device that was a much larger Gamut)
As I understand it, an IGI image which is stored in XYZ colour space is capable of holding colour information in the UV (and at the opposite end, IR) region, and currently there's no real way to use this information - when converting to RGB it is essentially lost.
Anyone - feel free to correct me if i'm wrong.
As I understand it, an IGI image which is stored in XYZ colour space is capable of holding colour information in the UV (and at the opposite end, IR) region, and currently there's no real way to use this information - when converting to RGB it is essentially lost.
Anyone - feel free to correct me if i'm wrong.
As I understood it, XYZ = RGB in float value, which means, you can save HDR renders....
you can have colours, that are brighter than the monitor can show (sun and lightsources, for example )
Noone would want an UV-monitor: NOT GOOD FOR YOUR EYES - and IR also wouldn't be too good: it's warm - in summer, TOO warm
I mean, ok, if you want to barbecue your eyes.... xD
you can have colours, that are brighter than the monitor can show (sun and lightsources, for example )
Noone would want an UV-monitor: NOT GOOD FOR YOUR EYES - and IR also wouldn't be too good: it's warm - in summer, TOO warm
I mean, ok, if you want to barbecue your eyes.... xD
450 isnt realy technicaly uv. is on the verge which means its still visable and doesnt cause cancer. sunburn rays start at UVB which is 320 and cancer rays are UVC which is 290. i once attempted to build a tea nitrogen laser which shot rays in the 345-430 range and the light from that would have still been partialy vissable
a shiny monkey is a happy monkey
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests