Show off your final renders
-
CoolColJ
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:47 pm
Post
by CoolColJ » Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:53 am
Kram1032 wrote:CoolColJ wrote:I want a Q6600 quad core for christmas
I guess, 'til then, there are even better ones
More than half a year is much time for development.
That last sculpture is great
I like that colour.
It's just that the Q6600 is going to be halved in price next month, as the Q6700 and Q6800 are coming out
It will have a new stepping which will drop the temps down by 10 degrees as well, even better for overclocking
JaMon_3D's Q6600 at 3 ghtz is about where the Q6800 will be for much cheaper
that would be about 6x faster than my P4 2.8c at 3+ ghtz
I get 337 points max in Cinebench on my system the Q6600 at stock speed gets over 1300 with 4 threads... at 3 ghtz it's around 2000...
-
JaMon_3D
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:36 am
Post
by JaMon_3D » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:32 am
Thanks a lot for all your kind comments!!!
CoolColJ, I have just passed the CineBench 9.5 and the speed is 1531 points..
Another one using NK data file.
Cheers!
JaMon
-
Attachments
-
- 8 hours of render.
- Ind_Test_270607.jpg (193.65 KiB) Viewed 3922 times
-
ThatDude33
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:26 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by ThatDude33 » Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:20 am
The middle two (renders 2 and 3) look fantastic!
Matt B. >>Maya To Indigo<<
-
CoolColJ
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:47 pm
Post
by CoolColJ » Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:33 am
JaMon_3D wrote:Thanks a lot for all your kind comments!!!
CoolColJ, I have just passed the CineBench 9.5 and the speed is 1531 points..
Another one using NK data file.
Cheers!
JaMon
how many threads did you do the test with?
Have you tried 8 threads seeing as the Q6600 has hyperthreading?
-
JaMon_3D
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:36 am
Post
by JaMon_3D » Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:25 am
Hello,
I have tried 8 threads but I didn't obtain better figures.
I believe that the Quad Core doesn't have hyperthreading...
another one using NK data file.
Cheers,
JaMon
-
Attachments
-
- Ind_Test_210707.jpg (332.28 KiB) Viewed 3801 times
-
Stur
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:52 pm
- Location: Nancy, France
Post
by Stur » Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:28 am
Very very nice ! I love it
-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:41 am
GREAT! How did you do it?
-
CTZn
- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
- Location: Paris, France
Post
by CTZn » Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:01 am
Kram1032 wrote:GREAT! How did you do it?
My bet is that's a combination of Sculpture Generator and TopMod
obsolete asset
-
JaMon_3D
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:36 am
Post
by JaMon_3D » Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:03 am
Hello,
sorry for my late answer;
For this one, I have used
k3dsurf, Silo to add volume and TopMod to create the holes.
Thanks for your kind words!
Cheers,
JaMon
-
JaMon_3D
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:36 am
Post
by JaMon_3D » Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:15 pm
Hello all,
another one from KnotPlot and TopMod.
Thanks!
JaMon
-
Attachments
-
- 19 hours rendering...
- Ind_Test_260707.jpg (484.12 KiB) Viewed 3609 times
-
DaveC
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: The Tottenham, London, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DaveC » Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:44 pm
Just went to see if I could try out knotplot on my computer and you have to BUY BEFORE YOU TRY
Like NORMAL software
I'm desperately shocked
Great renders, by the way
-
JaMon_3D
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:36 am
-
CoolColJ
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:47 pm
Post
by CoolColJ » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:07 pm
that 2nd one looks freaky in a nice way!
Hyper real!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests