render to comparison

Announcements, requests and support regarding the 3DS MAX exporter
User avatar
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:52 am
Location: Dominican Rep.

Post by jansan » Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:29 pm

Excellent the comparison, thanks for the archives.
Several questions arise Because the textures and illumination in Vray are so bad?
And because in Kerkythea the textures in the pictures against the wall disappear?
It is BusyRay UnBiased?

User avatar
1st Place Winner
Posts: 1295
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:25 am
Location: Berlin

Post by psor » Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:42 pm

Heya jansan,

I'll take an educated guess ... for vray he is using PPT for the
first and secondary bounce and this needs a lot of time to
converge to a clean image. And the glass in Kerkythea seems
to suffer from a caustics through glass problem, like maxwell
did. As for BusyRay ... here the featurelist:

Code: Select all

Global Illumination yes
Per-pixel accuracy estimation yes
Textures yes
Specular reflection yes
Fresnel reflection yes
Glossy reflection yes
Texture background yes
Bump mapping yes
Area shadows yes
Self-illumination yes
Skylight yes
High Dynamic Range channel output yes
Alpha channel yes
Editing of tone mapping parameters yes
High quality antialiasing yes
Particle systems no
Depth of field no
Illumination by environment map no
Splines rendering no
Caustics no
Refraction no
IES light sources no
So it is indeed biased. ;o)

take care

User avatar
Posts: 216
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:26 pm

Post by ThatDude33 » Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:04 pm

I already posted the busyray things in an earlier post :?

and it seems that busyray is unbiased (with what few features it has) if you set the error amount to 0. If not it starts looking like a photon mapper :shock:
Matt B. >>Maya To Indigo<<

User avatar
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:57 am

Post by isma » Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:54 am

These are comparisons (not definitive)



they will be adjourned to every improvement (of surrender, of time, etc) posting the various parameters used in the respective programs.
We will also make the tests with different system of calculation, if they are present in the program.

Time employed for the tests (20 minutes)
Used PC (amd dual opteron 265 - 4g ram - xp 32)

whoever is not happy about the results you can unload the scene
to improve the test (posting the image and the relative used parameters)

scene obj + textures


User avatar
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:57 am

Post by isma » Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:38 am

User avatar
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:57 am

Post by isma » Sun Aug 27, 2006 4:50 am

new entry fryrender

These are comparisons (not definitive)

TEST SKYDOME ... kydome.jpg


User avatar
Posts: 482
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Gießen Germany

Post by tungee » Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:01 pm

do you buy fryrender or is it a demo?

cool tests isma!

User avatar
Posts: 1029
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:50 am
Location: Tirol - Austria

Post by manitwo » Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:10 pm

in the right corner of the fryrender img: "by dideje"
i think dideje rendered that image :wink:

Post Reply
23 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest