Help me to understand if that render is phisically correct

General questions about Indigo, the scene format, rendering etc...
Post Reply
7 posts • Page 1 of 1
cinema
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 10:16 pm

Help me to understand if that render is phisically correct

Post by cinema » Mon Jun 09, 2008 10:21 pm

Hi everybody,
please, help me to understand if that render is phisically correct. I'm not sure about theese different diffuse stripes on the ground, like arrow shows on attached file. Materials are very basic, only diffuse and bump maps used. Light sources are made with a metal box closed by a glass surface, like in reality.
Thanks to all! Best regards
Attachments
indigo_different_stripes.jpg
indigo_different_stripes.jpg (277.12 KiB) Viewed 1477 times

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Post by PureSpider » Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:05 pm

Um there is no problem with the reflection as the one you marked is actually the reflection of the statue on the left of the one you marked ;)

User avatar
cpfresh
Posts: 501
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:20 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Post by cpfresh » Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:08 am

... looks odd to me. seems like the exponent of the floor material is changing ... ?

User avatar
Pibuz
1st Place 100
Posts: 2646
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Padua, Italy
3D Software: SketchUp

Post by Pibuz » Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:11 am

Hi cinema! I experienced a thing like this when using an old version of SkIndigo and Indigo, after having applied a png texture..

1. what version(s) are you using for rendering this scene?
2. is your floor texture a jpg? If not, convert any other format to obtain a jpg

User avatar
palawat
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:45 pm
Location: Bangkok, TH

Post by palawat » Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:10 pm

like PureSpider, I don't see anything unusual, except for the weird glares on the floor lighting (too much, maybe?).
Cheers,

Q9550 2.83 GHz, Geforce 9400 GT, 4 GB ram, XP 32/Vista 64

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6227
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Contact:

Post by OnoSendai » Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:14 pm

It may be that bug where a 1 component JPEG is used for the bump instead of a greyscale 3 component JPEG.

cinema
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 10:16 pm

Post by cinema » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:23 am

Thanks to all for reply.
I'm actually using the latest release of indigo and cindigo.
Yes, I used some png and some jpeg (<3 because of algorithm limit).
NO SkIndigo used, NO exponent is changing (I think)....only diffuse map with 1 color and 1 bump in grayscale.
I think that stripes limits are too sharp: light bounces should be much more diffuse and scattered.
Sorry for my bad english, thank for reply, best regards!

p.s.: I should continue this way to test indigo....I would like to help this community testing and improving benefits to indigo.

Post Reply
7 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests