new indigo logo design

tungee · Post by **tungee** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:39 pm

hey radiance i like your logo the most!

matsta · Post by **matsta** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:45 am

hey guys. i was trying to come up with a new design. i was trying hard then i realised that the current design is actually really nice. so i stuck with it and just tweeked it up and make it a bit simplar. let me know wat u think?!

here it is:

thanks
hope u like

mat

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:47 am

nice!

matsta · Post by **matsta** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:51 am

hehe thanks kram... as i said.. not that drastic. but i think it does well

thanks
mat

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:53 am

joegiampaoli · Post by **joegiampaoli** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:54 am

Oh wow, I didn't see that one matsta, that one is really nice!

matsta · Post by **matsta** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:55 am

thanks joeg... btw was this whole thing ever gonna actually happen or was it just a fun play around XD hehe. hope ono's been reading this thread

joegiampaoli · Post by **joegiampaoli** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:05 am

I don't know you know.....

I mean, same with the matpreview scene....

I had to do my own mat preview scene to use with blendigo, it's just a really simple thing but someone should like do a voting forum for both the logo and preview material scene, It's like radiance said in there that it's all starting out like a circus....

All kinds of ideas flowing but nothing....

mrCarnivore · Post by **mrCarnivore** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:31 pm

I like the old logo much, much more than any other suggestions so far!

DaveC · Post by **DaveC** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 2:25 am

mrCarnivore wrote:I like the old logo much, much more than any other suggestions so far!

Me too! I think the old one is great. And quite professional and versatile enough as well. Let's keep it! PLEASE!!

manitwo · Post by **manitwo** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:01 am

i vote for a new one.
the old is really hard to use and i ensure you it's not what most people call a professional logo.
A logo should look good.
A logo should look good in small size.
A logo should look good in big size. (therefore it has to be vector-based)
A logo should work in black&white. (or atleast have a b&w version)
A logo shouldn't have a gradient in it (or should have atleast a version of it without a gradient)
A logo should be catchy.
... and some points more which i can't remember.

DaveC · Post by **DaveC** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:46 am

@manitwo: The current logo is, or can be, all of those things.

manitwo · Post by **manitwo** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:52 am

DaveC wrote:The current logo is

no its not.

DaveC wrote:or can be

it would need to be modified - if you do so (make a vector-based one out of the current) you'll see that it won't look that good anymore.

Cire · Post by **Cire** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:52 am

Well, I'm still stuck on my original concept . . . but it did need something. So I revised the graphic and the text:

Here it is a watermark:

Camox · Post by **Camox** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:01 am

A small logo, but less sometimes is more. I still try.

new indigo logo design

radiance

Who is online