h

Discuss stuff not about Indigo.
yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:05 am

11h 23min. A masterpiece of light. Only possible with indigo. Not finished indeed, better. Some space to imagine. With problems with model and smoothing... the same, a masterpiece of digital artesany. If you love indigo for a reason, this is one of this...
Attachments
Protostudies_3.2.jpg
canon_24mm_50.rar
(10.66 MiB) Downloaded 22 times
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

User avatar
pixie
Indigo 100
Posts: 2286
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:54 am
Location: Away from paradise
3D Software: Cinema 4D
Contact:

Re: h

Post by pixie » Sat Jul 09, 2022 9:46 pm

amazing mood, ethereal even!

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:11 pm

So many thanks!
Arquitectural studies...
O-55.jpg
catedral_2022.jpg
catedral_2022_2.jpg
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

Alamy
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:16 am

Re: h

Post by Alamy » Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:13 pm

yonosoy wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:11 pm
So many thanks!
Arquitectural studies...
O-55.jpg
catedral_2022.jpg
catedral_2022_2.jpg
Nice studies, hope to see more

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Tue Aug 02, 2022 5:59 am

Hello Alamy, thank you.

About the questions of the other thread, I will try to manage new planetary scenes and is planned to share the workflow. It is very simple and too complex at the same time. Stay there...

The other question is simple, enclose your scene within a box (a bit bigger) and give to it a specular material with an IOR of 1, no absorption and a subttle SSS (try some values), try the uniform spectrum for the mediums and give to it a precedence of 2 (don´t forget to rise other material precedences if required).

8∇_(S966). Or simply "matter".
80 hours of render, +63K samples per pixel ... perfect spheres are in this way ... The concept is essential and exact. Try to poligonize the spheres and you got a perfect image in 20 hours (but not this apperture diffraction). The HDR manipulation is needed to see all the light process but dirt a lot the solution. There is to see what must be seen (erotic). Perfect spheres don´t work in indigo 4.6, try 4.4 sereies or the first 4 series for physical apperture. :)
Attachments
matter.rar
(146.24 KiB) Downloaded 16 times
8∇_(S966).pigs
(4.55 KiB) Downloaded 15 times
8∇_(S966).jpg
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

Alamy
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:16 am

Re: h

Post by Alamy » Tue Aug 02, 2022 9:42 am

Thanks for the reply, I'm here waiting for this amazing workflow, and I will try making this box with fog material, I hope that I will reach the same result, Can you tell me exactly what type of light is inside these spotlights? is it light material or an ies file? ... outstanding new test here, so is it better to use the 4.4 or the first 4 series?

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:01 pm

HI Alamy.

The light was a material with an IES file, can´t remember more.

Only perfect spheres and physical aperture difraction are conditioned to a prior release. Perfect spheres work for 4.4.16, more over don´t work. Physical aperture don´t work in all the 4 serie, except in the first releases.

In art is considered like an accumulation.
Attachments
catedral_03.jpg
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:16 pm

9h pure 4K.
2022_mie_cumulus_in_atmosphere_(onion_system)_01.jpg
40h pure 4K.
2022_mie_cumulus_in_atmosphere_(onion_system)_02.jpg
0:30 h pure 4K.
Bronzes, the origin.jpg
Bronzes, the origin.pigs
(35.03 KiB) Downloaded 16 times
If you obtain a cool picture from whatever scene I was posted, please hang it here and we talk about :)
This three are renderer with the 4.4.16 release...
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:53 pm

18 min. Metropolis bidirectional. Pure 4K.
2022_He_02.jpg
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:57 pm

42 min., metro bidir, pure 4K.
Que se note que es un renderizado porque se distinguen unos pixeles de otros es bello. Esto es difícil de vender a un cliente, pero no tengo...
Forest_mist_2022_mie.jpg
57 min. When I discover why the eliptical diafragm lets a bright spot I will share the cam again. Near to be perfect...
Protostudies_roots.jpg
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

Alamy
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:16 am

Re: h

Post by Alamy » Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:40 am

yonosoy wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:16 pm
9h pure 4K.
2022_mie_cumulus_in_atmosphere_(onion_system)_01.jpg
2022_mie_cumulus_in_atmosphere_(onion_system)_01.pigs

40h pure 4K.
2022_mie_cumulus_in_atmosphere_(onion_system)_02.jpg
2022_mie_cumulus_in_atmosphere_(onion_system)_02.pigs

0:30 h pure 4K.
Bronzes, the origin.jpg
Bronzes, the origin.pigs

If you obtain a cool picture from whatever scene I was posted, please hang it here and we talk about :)
This three are renderer with the 4.4.16 release...
Your work and renders are just incredible, can you tell me where I can find the mie_cumulus phase function, I want to make some tests.

Alamy
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:16 am

Re: h

Post by Alamy » Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:41 am

yonosoy wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:53 pm
18 min. Metropolis bidirectional. Pure 4K.
2022_He_02.jpg
sorry for this question, but what does Metroplis bidirectional mean?

Alamy
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:16 am

Re: h

Post by Alamy » Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:43 am

yonosoy wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:57 pm
42 min., metro bidir, pure 4K.
Que se note que es un renderizado porque se distinguen unos pixeles de otros es bello. Esto es difícil de vender a un cliente, pero no tengo...
Forest_mist_2022_mie.jpg

57 min. When I discover why the eliptical diafragm lets a bright spot I will share the cam again. Near to be perfect...
Protostudies_roots.jpg
I want to achieve the same effect that comes from the sun rays with the trees, Is this done by the box & Fog way?

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Sat Aug 13, 2022 7:38 am

You must change the tag "uniform" for mie_cumulus with a text editor, is not inplemented:
</scattering_coefficient>
<phase_function>
<mie_cumulus>
</mie_cumulus>
</phase_function>

Render settings, render mode, metropolis bidirectional. Test it. Seems that you are a "GPU animal" :) (is normal, I understand).

The top of the box is deformed with a meaning of the landscape (very few polygons, less octaves, same code. Do it in houdini is simple. If I have time I give examples of that. The fog is mie cumulus.
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

yonosoy
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Location: Spain

Re: h

Post by yonosoy » Fri Aug 26, 2022 4:21 am

.
Attachments
Morning_Bird.jpg
Elliptic_lens_flare.jpg
"... nor 0.2 galaxys, nor 0.8 little chikens ..."
https://makersplace.com/yonosoy_nada/

Post Reply
241 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests