GPU Rendering anyone?!

Feature requests, bug reports and related discussion
Post Reply
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
m25
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:31 am

GPU Rendering anyone?!

Post by m25 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:41 am

Hello, I'm very new to the forum and new to indigo, starting to use it with Blender and I like it. There's not many problems I have, only have lo learn to deal a bit with textures and that's all.
What is lately becoming really disturbing, is all the rumors about future GPGPU processing, i.e. using your video card to accelerate the job done by te CPU. nVidia is already out with CUDA and their cards now rock at F@H, ATi will release Catalyst 8.12 in December, unlocking the stream computing power of their video cards. I also know there is software around that already supports GPU rendering and the speedup is anyway from 10 to 50x faster than a CPU.
Has anyone thought about developping such capabilities for Indigo?! One can spend a fortune building a super computer or a render farm but when I think I could use my $80, Radeon HD4670 to render 10 times faster than an Intel extreme quad, it just makes it hard for me to fall asleep at night.

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Post by PureSpider » Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:54 am

The third thread about this topic now... Use the search function d00dz! ;)

User avatar
pixie
Indigo 100
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:54 am
Location: Away from paradise
3D Software: Cinema 4D
Contact:

Post by pixie » Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:32 am

It's that time of the year again! :D
Last edited by pixie on Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kram1032
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
Location: Austria near Vienna

Post by Kram1032 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:41 am

The third thread? Are you sure? I thought, there where more....

User avatar
fused
Developer
Posts: 3648
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:19 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
3D Software: Cinema 4D

Post by fused » Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:50 am

...many more...

User avatar
Borgleader
Posts: 2149
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:48 am

Post by Borgleader » Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:35 am

fused wrote:...many more...
Yep...much more than three. After RTFM ... STFF :lol: (who can guess what that is?)
benn hired a mercenary to kill my sig...

User avatar
Zom-B
1st Place 100
Posts: 4700
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
Contact:

Post by Zom-B » Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:53 am

Search the Fu****g Forum ^^

Sorry for the harsch welcome m25... don't take it personaly!

GPU related speed ups in unbaised renderengines will hopefully be a topic in 2009.
If you check http://www.gpgpu.org/ you'll see that there is not much about Raytracing for GPU to find. Double precision & big amount of RAM are the two most important things to start with!
polygonmanufaktur.de

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Post by PureSpider » Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:53 am

STFF... search thre fucking forums! :D

m25
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:31 am

Post by m25 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:12 am

Sorry guys, I did that before but looks like the search is not very smart, because I loked for "GPU rendering" and "video card rendering" before posting this and all the results showed was unrelated topics with the "rendering" keyword only. Sorry again, this is just everywhere:
http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/605181/a ... t-812.html
http://www.insidehw.com/News/Software/A ... ember.html

@ZomB
Double precision is somethin ATIs HD4000 series already has built in and as for large amounts of memory, 512-1GB GDDR3 is the standard today, some midrange $200 cards also have 2GB and no manufacturer would spare 2GB or more if they had a reason. ATi is already working with M$, Adobe and others to GOU enable their apps very soon and very soon, I think Vray, MentalRay etc will be part of "the others".

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Post by CTZn » Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:24 am

However the technologies are not mature yet, and given as the SSE issue evolves I don't see HW implementations coming soon in Indigo, but that's my opinion only.
obsolete asset

User avatar
eman7613
Posts: 597
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:52 pm

Post by eman7613 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:25 am

m25 wrote:... M$....
Yay, someone else who uses this abbreviation :roll: :lol:

But on a real note, I think a lot of people are going to hold out on GPU processing until larrabe lands (or is at least a little closer), which should realy shake up that aspect - as it is supposed much closer to a regular CPU than ati's and nvidia's GPUs are - and the big thing intell pushes about it is that it is highly programable (and uses x86 instruction sets).
Yes i know, my spelling sucks

m25
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:31 am

Post by m25 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:29 am

eman7613 wrote:
m25 wrote:... M$....
But on a real note, I think a lot of people are going to hold out on GPU processing until larrabe lands (or is at least a little closer), which should realy shake up that aspect - as it is supposed much closer to a regular CPU than ati's and nvidia's GPUs are - and the big thing intell pushes about it is that it is highly programable (and uses x86 instruction sets).
Yep, another reason for looking towards GPUs for now and even if it looks a world apart, today's GPUs are already very similar to CPUs. If ATi and nVidia take it seriously, larrabe will still have a lot to learn when it lands. There's a lot to get out of all this technology emerging nowadays, especially for our rendering needs; if a midrange card can render 10s of Crysis frames each second...

Post Reply
12 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DotBot [Bot] and 77 guests