[REQ] Seperate Indigo Preview Renderer

Feature requests, bug reports and related discussion
Post Reply
14 posts • Page 1 of 1
Anthony
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:42 pm

[REQ] Seperate Indigo Preview Renderer

Post by Anthony » Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:17 pm

It would be great to have a seperate preview renderer, that sacrifices whatever needs to be for speed, but still giving a result similar to how the material will look in a final render.

User avatar
suvakas
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 2613
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Post by suvakas » Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:26 pm

Yeah.. please Ono, can you turn Indigo into Maxwell clone a bit faster. I can't wait any longer :lol: (joke..sry..I couldn't resist)

For preview you can render at low resolution or turn down the AA samples. I would rather see more useful features implemented than a separate low quality renderer.

mrCarnivore
Posts: 517
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:20 am
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Post by mrCarnivore » Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:19 pm

omg: suvakas you sound just like deus.

:shock: :shock: :shock:

User avatar
Marcofly
Posts: 407
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:51 am
Location: Köln, Germany

Post by Marcofly » Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:59 pm

yes, suvakas answer also surprises me :shock:

I suppose many of us would like to have a 'real time preview'. I use maxwell and c4d-AR, and both have a sort of material editor, so we are talking about 'useful features', not about Indigo as a 'maxwell-clone'.
i think indigo has reached a very very high quality, in terms of output image and stability. But the scene-setup is still slow, compared to maxwell and AR: Ono has done (and is still doing) a GREAT job, and i am sure he is going to do something in this sense.

Bye!
:wink:

User avatar
suvakas
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 2613
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Post by suvakas » Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:01 am

mrCarnivore wrote:omg: suvakas you sound just like deus.

:shock: :shock: :shock:
lol :lol: :lol: :lol:
Sry about that 8)
Yeah, a preview renderer would be great. :wink:

[edit]
There was a thread some time ago about multi-light being "must have feature". Me being sarcastic is realated to the fact, that so many requests are actually the exact same features, that Maxwell has. Wouldn't it be cool, if Indigo would be better than Maxwell and not the copy of Maxwell? Nah.. i'm too lazy to explain my thoughts on this. Sure.. a preview renderer would be a great thing. I have nothing against it 8)

okazaky
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:30 am

Post by okazaky » Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:20 am

suvakas wrote:Wouldn't it be cool, if Indigo would be better than Maxwell and not the copy of Maxwell?
The answer is YES, i think :D
But some things are much easier in maxwell than in indigo. But i think it's only a question of time until indigo is better than maxwell ;)

User avatar
suvakas
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 2613
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Post by suvakas » Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:38 am

Yes, yes, yes.. I get that 8)
It just makes me smile everytime someone makes a request like directly from Maxwell's manual or something. Don't know why, but it seems funny. Indigo = free Maxwell for the masses? 8)

User avatar
Zom-B
1st Place 100
Posts: 4700
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
Contact:

Post by Zom-B » Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:03 am

Perhaps such a Preview low quality renderer would be usefull,
but there are lots of other features that I find much more interesting!

The need for a preview is based on Indigos low rendering speed,
but why not use the work time to implement such a Preview Mode
instead to speed up the Renderer by using Exit Portals, some SSE X
enchantments, GPU support general code clean ups etc.

Finally the best solution is to buy a new Rig for you guys,
who cry about the Rendering Speed :wink:

BTW: I support suvakas first posting!!!
polygonmanufaktur.de

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Post by CTZn » Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:57 am

yes, me too. render a low res and under Windows hit [Windows]+r then type magnify.
obsolete asset

User avatar
deltaepsylon
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:50 pm

Post by deltaepsylon » Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:27 am

CTZn wrote:yes, me too. render a low res and under Windows hit [Windows]+r then type magnify.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Deus
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:47 am

Post by Deus » Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:04 pm

Muahahaha Its spreading :lol:

I'd like a preview renderer too actually... :)

User avatar
suvakas
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 2613
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Post by suvakas » Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:20 pm

Yeah, using low settings/resolution is for babies. Separate preview renderer is for real men :twisted: :lol:

User avatar
deltaepsylon
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:50 pm

Post by deltaepsylon » Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:54 am

but for the preview render, there would have to be some quality-for-speed sacrifices. so unless you want a wireframe preview ( which is kinda pointless) then I'd say go with lower res. Or just render it at a size that will fill you monitor, then take a cuple steps back and squint. :D

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Post by CTZn » Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:25 am

You can set <max_depth> to 4 or 6, but in this case indirect lighting may be dimmer.
obsolete asset

Post Reply
14 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 70 guests