[REQ] v4 video functionality

Feature requests, bug reports and related discussion
User avatar
Oscar J
1st Place Winner
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:47 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
3D Software: Blender

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by Oscar J » Fri Apr 01, 2016 6:58 am

It doesn't - you do. With halt time or halt spp.

User avatar
contegufo
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:41 am
Location: Lucca ITALY

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by contegufo » Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:20 am

I believe it is not an easily understandable system proves that there are very few examples on the web!
What are the differences between halt time or halt spp?
Mac Mini 2011 - 2,3 GHz Intel Core i5
16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 - Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 Mb.
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB - MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6



https://www.behance.net/Paolo_Conti

User avatar
Oscar J
1st Place Winner
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:47 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
3D Software: Blender

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by Oscar J » Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:44 am

I'm sorry, but it literally could not be any easier.

In one box you specify at what time each frame should halt, and in the other box you specify at what spp (samples per pixel) the rendering should halt. If you don't specify either, Indigo will keep on rendering the frame for an unlimited time, which means you'll face great difficulties getting any animation out of it.

http://indigorenderer.com/documentation ... r-settings

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by CTZn » Tue Apr 05, 2016 2:34 am

Do a test render for one image until you reached the desired visual quality. The halt settings can be inferred from the time it took to reach this quality, and the actual sample count of the test render.

If your sequence is changing a lot you want to use several test frames along the animation for better tuning.

Also, it is best to have the render halting by sample count rather than by time, for a consistant sampling result across frames.
obsolete asset

User avatar
contegufo
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:41 am
Location: Lucca ITALY

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by contegufo » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:48 am

Hi

Thanks for your kind response.
In truth I suspect that may be made of the earlier tests.
In essence it is preferable to halt spp vs halt time, right?
Mac Mini 2011 - 2,3 GHz Intel Core i5
16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 - Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 Mb.
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB - MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6



https://www.behance.net/Paolo_Conti

User avatar
galinette
1st Place Winner
Posts: 923
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Nantes, France
Contact:

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by galinette » Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:09 pm

contegufo wrote:Hi

Thanks for your kind response.
In truth I suspect that may be made of the earlier tests.
In essence it is preferable to halt spp vs halt time, right?
This depends on your constraints. If you have 48h to render 4 images, set your halt time to 12h.
The main advantage of halt spp is, the quality will not depend on the computer you are using. For instance if you are using your laptop and your desktop to render a set of images, and you want consistent quality across images, set them to the same halt spp.
Eclat-Digital Research
http://www.eclat-digital.com

User avatar
contegufo
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:41 am
Location: Lucca ITALY

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by contegufo » Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:56 am

Hi

Once a frame is calculated automatically switches to the next?
It would be desirable to also save as movie as well as single frame.
Mac Mini 2011 - 2,3 GHz Intel Core i5
16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 - Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 Mb.
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB - MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6



https://www.behance.net/Paolo_Conti

User avatar
Zom-B
1st Place 100
Posts: 4700
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
Contact:

Re: [REQ] v4 video functionality

Post by Zom-B » Wed Apr 06, 2016 6:53 am

contegufo wrote:Once a frame is calculated automatically switches to the next?
Yes, that what the render-queue is for :)
polygonmanufaktur.de

Post Reply
38 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests