Photography (not amazing)

Photoguy · Post by **Photoguy** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:57 pm

I did this recently just for fun, I like how it looks except for the wall

Modelled in Blender.
I used HDRI for the lighting.
Rendered for 60(!) hours on a 2.4ghz pentium (One core)
4800 samples per pixel.

A couple people have said (not on this forum) that the frame looked bent...
The frame isn't bent, I just put the camera at a weird angle and used a wide lens (26mm)

palawat · Post by **palawat** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:18 pm

60 hours just for fun !

Anyway, I like the frame material. Nicely done.

It probably need a piece of glass to cover the photo. Then again, it might make you spend more than 60 hours to finish the rendering

Photoguy · Post by **Photoguy** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:20 pm

Actually there is a piece of glass covering it...
You can see a little bit of refelction in the bottom right corner.

BbB · Post by **BbB** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:11 am

I actually like the wall. Just a shame the tiling's a bit obvious. You should try to turn it into a bigger map in PShop.

zsouthboy · Post by **zsouthboy** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:43 am

Now model a house around that wall and picture!

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:58 am

...and an environment around the house and a planet around the environment and a solarsystem around the planet and a universe around the solar system so that you get correctly simulated night shots

:D xD

Post by **OnoSendai** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:18 am

kwistenbiebel · Post by **kwistenbiebel** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:57 am

Kram1032 wrote:...and an environment around the house and a planet around the environment and a solarsystem around the planet and a universe around the solar system so that you get correctly simulated night shots :D xD

Now that would be the only option to make it all really, I mean REALLY , physically correct, now wouldn't it

....
I hope Ono didn't forget to code the Big Bang and a folding universe.
If not, go ask the man in the wheel chair.

By the way,
A very nice photo of a photo

But 60 hours?..

palawat · Post by **palawat** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:48 am

Photoguy wrote:Actually there is a piece of glass covering it...
You can see a little bit of refelction in the bottom right corner.

And I thought that's on the picture you use for mapping, my bad.

Macrob · Post by **Macrob** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:41 am

Nice idea

I also tried some picture pictures, but the bump on the wall came out waaaay too slow, so I qiut rendering

The second image: http://www.indigorenderer.com/joomla/fo ... highlight=

Photoguy · Post by **Photoguy** » Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:01 am

Macrob wrote:Nice idea
I also tried some picture pictures, but the bump on the wall came out waaaay too slow, so I qiut rendering

The second image: http://www.indigorenderer.com/joomla/fo ... highlight=

Nice render, I like the reflections!

By the way, for the record..
I like to get my renders perfectly noise free.
That is why I rendered for 60 hours at 4800 samples.

Photoguy · Post by **Photoguy** » Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:45 am

Oh, I forgot to mention, the photo is also my work to

Of course, that's why my name is Photoguy.

Photography (not amazing)

Photography (not amazing)

Who is online