Stereoscopic Dosch flat

Sebastian · Post by **Sebastian** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:28 am

Wooaa, this Method of stereoskoping is too hard, can't u take another one ^^

But the Picture is nice ^^

neepneep · Post by **neepneep** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:14 am

fwoar!@ !!!! Its tough on the eyes but I did manage to see it in perfect 3D clarity!

I wish I could see all pics like that! This is an awesome idea!

edit: the telephone in the foreground is bugging me out and is really hard to focus on.

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:30 pm

Radiance, you have inverted the images

Try this one

Depth effect is too strong but nice, I think that's because the two cam positions are too distant (6-8 cm are good).

DaveC · Post by **DaveC** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:34 pm

NOW I see it. That is incredible. I didn't realize it was a mirror behind the stereo until I saw it in stereo-vision. WOW!

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:46 pm

I think that's because I don't cross my glazes, I put them in parallel. If I cross them I can't lock the images together plus its all blurry

Tato · Post by **Tato** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:53 am

i think the one where you cross your eyes is better. this is why radiance have inverted images. left for right eye and the right for left eye.and i find out that you can help with your hand after you got the 3d image to mask the surrounding. put your plams where the focus is and slowly decrease thedistance between them and you get one nice 3d image. and also it looks like a small model something like barbiehouse. try smaller distance between the two cameras.

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:09 am

It doesn't matter if you cross them or stay parallel

Just the correct position of the left and the right image is inversed!

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:29 pm

well at the end there are 2 ways at looking at the image, so there is no incorrect one in the absolute, there is the one wich works for you. The former one doesn't work for me, that's it.

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:08 pm

That's just, what I said before

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:17 am

Yes that's right. I just read your second line as a critic to one of the images, I misread

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:31 am

Hmm... yes, maybe, I've wrote it a bit unclear...
Doesn't matter

Deus · Post by **Deus** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:02 am

Actually you are both right. There are two ways of doing/seeing stereo images whats easiest to see depends on person!

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:30 am

OMG, that's what we're talking about all the time

We both noticed, that we both are right, as we both written the same in different words xD

ThatDude33 · Post by **ThatDude33** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:42 am

wow that has to be one of the coolest things ive ever seen

Deus · Post by **Deus** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 2:27 am

Sorry Didnt see you already realized

We were both right that we were both right!!

Stereoscopic Dosch flat

Who is online