My Renders

Post by **fused** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:27 am

Some of my renders...

SSS test:

rendered with indigo 0.7t1

Some Glasses

rendered with indigo 0.6 final

An Elevator:

rendered with indigo 0.6 final

One testrender out of a million:

rendered with indigo 0.6t1

c&c are welcome

sprocket · Post by **sprocket** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:57 am

Nice

I like the 'infinity mirrors' in the lift scene!

Are the candles life size, ie centimetres rather than metres? I'm curious as I just built a lava lamp and it rendered funny, turns out its because it was about 7 metres tall!

Good stuff!

Post by **fused** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:30 am

in c4d the big candle is 100x100 meters, indigo multiplies it wit 0.01 so it is 1x1 meters...

but i guess it doesnt really matter, or does it?

sprocket · Post by **sprocket** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:38 am

Not sure.. I think it does a little bit because rays going through a bigger object would be absorbed more, so you wouldn't need as high an absorption coefficient for the same result?
Still testing that one out at the moment...

Anyway they look wicked which is what counts!

DaveC · Post by **DaveC** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:36 pm

Those candles look absolutely fantastic! Wow!

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:03 pm

but i guess it doesnt really matter, or does it?

Yes for light absorbing materials, it does ! Of course if the object is bigger you can reduce absorbtion, but then it won't match real settings

Nice pics really !

Post by **fused** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:18 pm

thx.

ehm... yes, of course it matters when it comes to absorption... didnt really get the point...

anyway, does anyone know the ior of candle wax? couldnt find that on google or wikipedia... i guessed it must be somewhere between 1.1 and 1.2.

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:54 pm

Parafin wax has ior of 1.52 (just found that coz you where asking).

Post by **fused** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:00 pm

thx for the info. ill have to re-render the candles now. other color and more absorption though. i dont think that you can see - well i dont know what it is called - the thing that burns shining through a real candle.

manitwo · Post by **manitwo** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:05 pm

cool images fused!
now you could rerender the second one with 0.7 and polarisation

atmmatt · Post by **atmmatt** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:08 pm

Maybe it's me but am I seeing the wick through the little candle?

(is it even modeled all the way through?)

Very nice candles btw!!!

Post by **fused** » Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:55 am

yes it is modeled all the way through. but i dont think it is supposed to be seen. ill maybe rerender it with more absorption

isabelp1 · Post by **isabelp1** » Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:23 pm

please... tell me the formulations of your glass..
it's beautifull

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:26 am

well i dont know what it is called - the thing that burns shining through a real candle.

->flame?

Post by **fused** » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:04 am

@isabel: formulations? what do you mean with that?

@kram: what i meant was the wick (german: docht)

My Renders

My Renders

Who is online