Liquids Test Thread

Get feedback from others on your works in progress
User avatar
Whaat
Developer
Posts: 1827
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:15 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by Whaat » Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:50 am

I modelled the wineglass based on the Indigo Manual. I am trying to figure out why all my glassware renders show the black artifacts around the rim. I thought it was maybe a subdivision issue so this time I made sure the mesh was highly subdivided. Maybe it's still not enough. There are 60 mesh divisions around the circumference of the glass. The cross section of the glass itself should a fine enough mesh as well. I think there about 8 or more divisions around the rim of the glass. Is this not enough? How dense a mesh should the glassware be? I don't see these artifacts on the teapots or the glassware posted by Godzilla. What sort of subdivision/mesh density are you guys using for these models?

BTW, the wineglass is 7 3/4" tall.
Attachments
wineglass.png
wineglass.png (465.13 KiB) Viewed 2660 times

User avatar
Godzilla
Indigo 100
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:33 am

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by Godzilla » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:08 am

The black is a refraction of the black background... make your environment type something without a pitch black background?
samlavoie.xyz

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by CTZn » Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:07 pm

That's not the case, Godzilla :) in fact I was prone to think like you, but after testing it seems the black zones are caused by small faces, or small details/volumes, I'm not sure.

Here's how to proceed to find the appropriate scale to have a nice liquid render:

Turn all lights off, eventually set all absorbtions to zero, use an uniform background lighting. At a normal scale you will only see the black artifacts.

Then scale the scene up, until the glass becomes invisible, along with it's artifacts. Reset the desired environment and lighting, adapt absorbtion values and voila (example still cooking) !

Of course it's hacking into the scene scale, but it points to the issue...
Attachments
glass_em.jpg
17m tall glass
glass_em.jpg (155.23 KiB) Viewed 2598 times
glass_bg.jpg
at a normal scale
glass_bg.jpg (260.46 KiB) Viewed 2640 times
Last edited by CTZn on Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
obsolete asset

User avatar
Godzilla
Indigo 100
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:33 am

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by Godzilla » Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:49 pm

Any news on when/if the issue will be fixed? :(
samlavoie.xyz

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by OnoSendai » Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:00 pm

I'll have a look at it soon.

User avatar
Whaat
Developer
Posts: 1827
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:15 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by Whaat » Sun Jul 26, 2009 6:15 pm

Some interesting findings regarding the black artifacts issue:
They only seem to occur when using bidirectional! No black artifacts when using plain Path Tracing and plain MLT. I've got a new render cooking to show the difference. It's looking much better!

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by CTZn » Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:42 pm

Nice findings indeed whaat, I tried changing bidir's depth but that had no effect. Now a 17cm tall glass is artifact free when not using bidir, confirmed.

render above updated to 1000+spp

edit: comparing with the bidir-less render, I can tell that the 17m glass is still showing some black artifacts on the top edge, not as much as in the BG render but clearly "more than" a non bidir render, wich is not showing any it seems.
obsolete asset

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by PureSpider » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:00 pm

Godzilla wrote:I would definitely like that to be the liquid material preview, but it takes 63k SPP to clear up? :(
WytRaven wrote:The first scene I rendered for PureSpider (without Env) render about 40% faster than this one...
I post the shots without no env map at 10k SPP and with env map at 4k SPP for comparison :)
I definitely like the env map version better!

€dit: Added a render with 2 SPP rendered by my crap pc in 5 minutes, just to try it :mrgreen:
Attachments
im1248449365.png
2 SPP for comparison
im1248449365.png (714.79 KiB) Viewed 2601 times
pot_v3_4Kspp.png
With env map at 4k SPP
pot_v3_4Kspp.png (554.26 KiB) Viewed 2600 times
pot_v2_10Kspp.png
No env map at 10k SPP
pot_v2_10Kspp.png (397.06 KiB) Viewed 3495 times

User avatar
Whaat
Developer
Posts: 1827
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:15 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by Whaat » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:55 am

@purespider:
I love the last teapot scene (with no environment map). Can you share the IGS please? :)

Here is the render of the same scene as above. The only difference is that bidirectional is turned off. (changed white balance, too)
Attachments
wineglassplainMLTandJuice.png
wineglassplainMLTandJuice.png (484.21 KiB) Viewed 2525 times

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by PureSpider » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:58 am

May I ask why you prefer the no env version, first?

User avatar
Whaat
Developer
Posts: 1827
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:15 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by Whaat » Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:36 am

PureSpider wrote:May I ask why you prefer the no env version, first?
I thought Wyt said that it rendered 40% faster. Does it?

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by PureSpider » Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:43 am

I am working on a scene with exit portals and all the fancy stuff with help of ZomB at the moment to get the env map version faster, so if you don't mind for the rendering speed, which scene would you pick?

User avatar
Whaat
Developer
Posts: 1827
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:15 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by Whaat » Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:50 am

Well then maybe the one with env map :)

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by PureSpider » Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:13 am

Ehm Wyt did it render 40% faster compared to the same scene with the new teapot model and no env map or compared to the old model that had no envmap neither?

User avatar
WytRaven
Indigo 100
Posts: 905
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Dubbo, Australia
Contact:

Re: Liquids Test Thread

Post by WytRaven » Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:30 pm

New scene - no env was about 575000 samples per second on my machine, from memory, and new scene - with env map was running somwhere around 345000 samples per second.

So that's somewhere between 30 - 40% slower.

Your mileage may vary :lol:

I should note that despite both those scenes being rendered to extremely high spp I do not actually know at what point they were satisfactorily converged as I left them going while sleeping then sent the result to PureSpider when I got up.
:idea: "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds..." - Emerson 1841

Post Reply
157 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DotBot [Bot] and 137 guests