Page 263 of 295
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:27 am
by Oscar J
Nice! Where did you get the wood texture? Arroway?
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 5:47 am
by Voytech
Oscar J wrote:Nice! Where did you get the wood texture? Arroway?
Thanks. Nothing in that render is mine I should add. Wood texture is from here:
http://www.indigorenderer.com/materials/materials/1125
Had to modify the bump and scale but other than that it was almost perfect. It's a small tile though so that's why the really shallow DOF. The cup and spoon are from a sketchup plugin. EXR was off the net somewhere. I SIMPLY put it all together
Edit: Ok, I lied. The table I made.
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:58 am
by Polinalkrimizei
ENSLAVER, your "lasertest" is fantastic. Can't stop looking at it... but what is it?! Could you share your setup?
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:03 pm
by ENSLAVER
Polinalkrimizei wrote:ENSLAVER, your "lasertest" is fantastic. Can't stop looking at it... but what is it?! Could you share your setup?
Sure I posted it a while ago *searches* Ahh this post:
http://www.indigorenderer.com/forum/vie ... 75#p117675 There is one with fog and one without. The 3.6.22 update "Greatly improved responsiveness of realtime scene/camera changes with MLT." Is awesome for the fog scene
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:35 am
by vl_dm
...summertime...
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 am
by lycium
Such an awesome scene, great work! The image is kinda brutally JPEG compressed though
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:46 am
by Oscar J
Looks very cool!
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:49 am
by vl_dm
Thanks! I'm glad you like it. Sorry about that, it's ''a bit'' Lightroomed...
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:44 pm
by PureSpider
Brutal JPEG compression, I hear you say?
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:45 pm
by lycium
augh!
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:39 pm
by vl_dm
Ok, this is the original
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:45 pm
by lycium
That's definitely cleaner, but still quite JPEG compressed (e.g. in the topright corner, the red lines get smudged); basically the JPEG saving from Indigo is not always at the quality I'd like personally
Although, if there's any kind of postprocessing to be done (as in this case), the intermediate file really should be a PNG or TIFF etc to avoid excessive artifacting due to double lossy compression.
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 9:30 pm
by vl_dm
Thanks. I only resave it in PS from PNG to JPG level 8. Thanks for the tip
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 9:34 pm
by lycium
Ah then that's ideal (working from PNG). However, one thing about Photoshop is that it does not let you disable "chroma subsampling", where basically 2/3 of the image gets stored at 1/4 resolution! This is often easily seen in the red channel, especially in areas of contrast.
That's why I always use Irfanview for my final JPEG conversion (although GIMP has the option too), and keep this image in dropbox to link to people about it:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/303 ... images.png
PS. I fully understand that I am way too picky about JPEG quality
I already told PureSpider when we met in Berlin, that my "private hell" consists of beautiful CG images which are terribly compressed and mushy... hence his abuse above
Re: Simple Renderings Thread
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:36 am
by CTZn
vl_dm wrote:Ok, this is the original
I like the vignette more, should I ?