A Mie web calcutor
http://omlc.ogi.edu/calc/mie_calc.html
Extract of the results for initial values and a IOR of 1.33
# Mie Scattering # Version 2-3-3 (15:30:19 01/28/12)
# Oregon Medical Laser Center #
http://omlc.ogi.edu
# by Scott Prahl #
prahls@ohsu.edu
#
# radius 0.50000 [microns] (sphere radius)
# n_medium
1.00000 [---] (refractive index of medium)
# n_real 1.33000 [---] (refractive index of sphere)
# n_imag
0.00000 [---] (absorption of sphere)
# lambda_vac 0.63280 [microns] (wavelength in vaccuum)
# density 0.10000 [#/micron^3] (spheres per cubic micron)
#
# lambda 0.63280 [microns] (wavelength in medium)
# X 4.96459 [---] (size parameter)
# g
0.84539 [---] (average cosine of phase function)
# Qsca 3.5786 [---] (scattering efficiency)
# Qext 3.5786 [---] (extinction efficiency)
# Qback 0.38038 [---] (backscattering efficiency)
# Csca 2.8106 [micron^2] (scattering cross section)
# Cext 2.8106 [micron^2] (extinction cross section)
# Cback 0.29875 [micron^2] (backscattering cross section)
# mu_s
281.06 [1/mm] (scattering coefficient)
# mu_s' 43.456 [1/mm] (reduced scattering coefficient)
# mu_t 281.06 [1/mm] (total attenuation coefficient)
#
# The second column is normalized so that the integral of it over
# 4*pi steradians will be unity. The average of the 3rd & 4th
# columns is the second. The next three columns are normalized
# to the value at 0 degrees.
#
# natural = (|S1|^2+|S2|^2)/(pi X^2 Qsca)
# perpen = |S1|^2/(pi X^2 Qsca)
# parallel = |S2|^2/(pi X^2 Qsca)
# polarization = (|S1|^2-|S2|^2)/(|S1|^2+|S2|^2)
# S33 = Real(S2 * S1^*)
# S34 = -Imag(S2 * S1^*)
#
##theta natural perpen parallel natural perpen parallel polarization S33 S34
-176.400 0.00826 0.00812 0.00841 0.00402 0.00395 0.00409 -0.01755 -0.99938 -0.03045
-172.800 0.00774 0.00722 0.00826 0.00377 0.00351 0.00402 -0.06769 -0.98990 -0.12460
-169.200 0.00706 0.00607 0.00805 0.00343 0.00295 0.00391 -0.13973 -0.94785 -0.28644
.....
Zom-B, the pigs with IOR=1.0 ,g=0.84539 and two changes in the parameters, sacttering=281.0 (with the doubt about if this parameters are right related) and absorption=0.
Some minimal explanations of how to incorporate the data, please... There are part of the data that actually could not be.
Believe that the IOR could be now 1 (maybe break...). Light has change dramatically over scene (what I do?).
Edit: light changes because g=0.84... (not viewed this process). The light is subtle less dim. Do another one since there are doubts if you wish.
Note: the real tabulated data by itself don' t gives any kind of fireflies!!!