Indigo Renderer Forum

Godzilla wrote: ... the gallery should stop being treated as a photo gallery for all renders done in Indigo (That's what the forum is for ...

Good Idea ('+1'). Can't wait to see a rocking gallery!

EDIT: Booah, that EVERMOTION gallery is nice!

You are all quite right, it is something that very much needs work on it. Just the hap-hazard alignments are enough to make me crazy

Some errors occurring the the gallery at the moment in all sections except Nature and the Best Of..

How will you check if the render made with Indigo or not? All renders for the gallery should be with Indigo logo. Indigo will get extra promotion if anyone will copy the images.

Yet another suggestion: is it possible to choose a place Indigo logo will be rendered on? It would be veeeery sweet feature. Sometimes the composition needs Indigo logo to be in another place for not to hide details.

Termin8 wrote:How will you check if the render made with Indigo or not? All renders for the gallery should be with Indigo logo. Indigo will get extra promotion if anyone will copy the images.

Yet another suggestion: is it possible to choose a place Indigo logo will be rendered on? It would be veeeery sweet feature. Sometimes the composition needs Indigo logo to be in another place for not to hide details.

Then someone could just move the logo to a bright white area of their image to get rid of it.

Godzilla wrote: Then someone could just move the logo to a bright white area of their image to get rid of it.

0.7MP maximum resolution is a huge limitation, so no commercial usage of Indigo anyway. Also, i think that if someone will need to get rid of the Indigo logo on a 0.7MP, he will find a way to do it.

Termin8 wrote:

Godzilla wrote: Then someone could just move the logo to a bright white area of their image to get rid of it.

0.7MP maximum resolution is a huge limitation, so no commercial usage of Indigo anyway. Also, i think that if someone will need to get rid of the Indigo logo on a 0.7MP, he will find a way to do it.

I.e. Jeff's GH House entry. As far as I know, he stitched together a bunch of 0.7MP renderings to get rid of the logo and get a hi rez rendering. Clever.

StompinTom wrote:

Termin8 wrote:

Godzilla wrote: Then someone could just move the logo to a bright white area of their image to get rid of it.

0.7MP maximum resolution is a huge limitation, so no commercial usage of Indigo anyway. Also, i think that if someone will need to get rid of the Indigo logo on a 0.7MP, he will find a way to do it.

I.e. Jeff's GH House entry. As far as I know, he stitched together a bunch of 0.7MP renderings to get rid of the logo and get a hi rez rendering. Clever.

Which violates the TOS of the trial as far as I know..

Godzilla wrote: Which violates the TOS of the trial as far as I know..

There is at least one more workaround to replace the original Indigo Renderer logo with one's own. The easy one. The main limitation is size, so i think it would be good if Indigo logo could be a part of a composition sitting in the right place.

Termin8 wrote:

Godzilla wrote: Which violates the TOS of the trial as far as I know..

There is at least one more workaround to replace the original Indigo Renderer logo with one's own. The easy one. The main limitation is size, so i think it would be good if Indigo logo could be a part of a composition sitting in the right place.

Well, I guess if you want to move the logo around, buy a license and put it wherever you want. It's a demo limitation we have to deal with.

StompinTom wrote:Well, I guess if you want to move the logo around, buy a license and put it wherever you want. It's a demo limitation we have to deal with.

I don't argue about it. I agree with this limitation, but it would be great if the gallery contains the images with Indigo Logo. And sometimes it would be better for the image if the logo is in another place of the image.

Godzilla wrote:*Cough*

I don't mean to be a bother, but it's been a year and still no official response...

Urgh, it has been too long

We're painfully aware of this and are trying to find the resources to make the required changes; right now we're all focused on making Indigo more awesomer and have no free hands...

lycium wrote:Urgh, it has been too long

We're painfully aware of this and are trying to find the resources to make the required changes; right now we're all focused on making Indigo more awesomer and have no free hands...

Being awesome does tend to be a full time job

I'll just leave these here...

http://codecanyon.net/item/simplegallery-class/101268

http://codecanyon.net/item/imagebox-ima ... ript/89035

http://codecanyon.net/item/-photocms-ma ... sily/62023

And you may consider purchasing a Flash slideshow for the homepage which would be easier to update and allow tabs:

http://activeden.net/searches?categorie ... s&type_id=

StompinTom wrote:Being awesome does tend to be a full time job