Good Idea ('+1'). Can't wait to see a rocking gallery!Godzilla wrote: ... the gallery should stop being treated as a photo gallery for all renders done in Indigo (That's what the forum is for ...
EDIT: Booah, that EVERMOTION gallery is nice!
Good Idea ('+1'). Can't wait to see a rocking gallery!Godzilla wrote: ... the gallery should stop being treated as a photo gallery for all renders done in Indigo (That's what the forum is for ...
Termin8 wrote:How will you check if the render made with Indigo or not? All renders for the gallery should be with Indigo logo. Indigo will get extra promotion if anyone will copy the images.
Yet another suggestion: is it possible to choose a place Indigo logo will be rendered on? It would be veeeery sweet feature. Sometimes the composition needs Indigo logo to be in another place for not to hide details.
0.7MP maximum resolution is a huge limitation, so no commercial usage of Indigo anyway. Also, i think that if someone will need to get rid of the Indigo logo on a 0.7MP, he will find a way to do it.Godzilla wrote: Then someone could just move the logo to a bright white area of their image to get rid of it.
I.e. Jeff's GH House entry. As far as I know, he stitched together a bunch of 0.7MP renderings to get rid of the logo and get a hi rez rendering. Clever.Termin8 wrote:0.7MP maximum resolution is a huge limitation, so no commercial usage of Indigo anyway. Also, i think that if someone will need to get rid of the Indigo logo on a 0.7MP, he will find a way to do it.Godzilla wrote: Then someone could just move the logo to a bright white area of their image to get rid of it.
StompinTom wrote:I.e. Jeff's GH House entry. As far as I know, he stitched together a bunch of 0.7MP renderings to get rid of the logo and get a hi rez rendering. Clever.Termin8 wrote:0.7MP maximum resolution is a huge limitation, so no commercial usage of Indigo anyway. Also, i think that if someone will need to get rid of the Indigo logo on a 0.7MP, he will find a way to do it.Godzilla wrote: Then someone could just move the logo to a bright white area of their image to get rid of it.
There is at least one more workaround to replace the original Indigo Renderer logo with one's own. The easy one. The main limitation is size, so i think it would be good if Indigo logo could be a part of a composition sitting in the right place.Godzilla wrote: Which violates the TOS of the trial as far as I know..
Well, I guess if you want to move the logo around, buy a license and put it wherever you want. It's a demo limitation we have to deal with.Termin8 wrote:There is at least one more workaround to replace the original Indigo Renderer logo with one's own. The easy one. The main limitation is size, so i think it would be good if Indigo logo could be a part of a composition sitting in the right place.Godzilla wrote: Which violates the TOS of the trial as far as I know..
I don't argue about it. I agree with this limitation, but it would be great if the gallery contains the images with Indigo Logo. And sometimes it would be better for the image if the logo is in another place of the image.StompinTom wrote:Well, I guess if you want to move the logo around, buy a license and put it wherever you want. It's a demo limitation we have to deal with.
Godzilla wrote:*Cough*
Being awesome does tend to be a full time joblycium wrote:Urgh, it has been too long
We're painfully aware of this and are trying to find the resources to make the required changes; right now we're all focused on making Indigo more awesomer and have no free hands...
StompinTom wrote:Being awesome does tend to be a full time job
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests