Indigo 1.1.15

General News and accouncements regarding the Indigo render engine
Psychotron80
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:18 pm

Post by Psychotron80 » Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:49 am

I confirm too.

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Post by CTZn » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:33 pm

Same on win32, log.txt is empty despite the logging tag. It's straight on the second line:

Code: Select all

Executing 'indigo -o C:/work/3d/indigo/renders/marxD_notesTest.igs.png C:/work/3d/indigo/marxD_notesTest.igs'
WARNING: Failed to open log file at 'log.txt' for writing.
SSE present.
SSE2 present.
...
The file is created but left empty...

User avatar
SATtva_
1st Place Winner
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 6:44 am
Location: Russia, Siberia
Contact:

Post by SATtva_ » Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:52 am

SSE present.
SSE2 present.
I don't have these lines on Linux amd64. ;)

mateuszdraco
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: Poland, Cracow

Re: win vs lin (both x64)

Post by mateuszdraco » Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:17 am

OnoSendai wrote:As dougal2 said, please check you are using the same number of threads in both tests. The speeds of the linux build and windows build should be pretty similar.
You were right, on my ubuntu i have only one thread. And i found where to chage it ;) however vista is still faster ;)
Display took 2,51314 s
Total render time elapsed: 5 m, 20 s
Done 34470000,00000 samples (71,81250 samples per pixel)
107685,06780 samples / second (9,28634 micro-seconds / sample)

Executing './indigo default.igs -t 1'
Using base Indigo directory path '.'.
Scene file path: 'default.igs'
Using working directory path ''.
Loading Scene 'default.igs'...

....

Finished initialisation
Starting threads... (num threads: 1)
Starting render thread. (RNG seed=1)
As you can see there is no log.txt error and file isn't empty like on vista - it works. Also on ubuntu i don't have any SSE or SSE2 info, on vista it is for sure.

MSUdom5
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:04 am
Location: Mississippi, USA
Contact:

Post by MSUdom5 » Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:49 pm

Grimm wrote:Thanks eman,

I do have version 2.8, 2.8.9 to be exact. I did figure out one of my problems, getting the libwx_gtk2 libraries into /usr/lib64. I needed to add --libdir=/usr/lib64 to the configure command. The libraries are now built and in the right spot but now there is another problem. :roll:

The libraries built from the source code are named like so:

Code: Select all

libwx_base-2.8.so
libwx_gtk2_core-2.8.so.0
libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so        
libwx_gtk2_core-2.8.so
etc...
The libraries Indigo wants are named:

Code: Select all

libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0
libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0
libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0
etc...
Notice the gtk2 vrs. gtk2u and the base vrs. baseu differences. Well, I thought, I can just link those names to my libraries. It didn't work. :( This is the current error I'm getting,

Code: Select all

./indigo
./indigo: /usr/lib64/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0: version `WXU_2.8' not found (required by ./indigo)
./indigo: /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0: version `WXU_2.8' not found (required by ./indigo)
It looks like there is some difference with the libraries I compiled and the ones that Indigo expects. I searched the wxGTK web forum but didn't find anything about a WXU version. I also checked the configure file to see if there was an option but no luck. The saga continues. :)
Grimm,

I can confirm these results. I tried pretty much the same thing, and am getting the same error:

Code: Select all

./indigo
./indigo: /usr/lib64/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0: version `WXU_2.8' not found (required by ./indigo)
./indigo: /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0: version `WXU_2.8' not found (required by ./indigo)
I am also running Fedora 9. I'd like to know what the 'u' means in "libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0". It's more than likely a build setting that needs to set at configuration. I'll continue to look into it. If anyone has any additional info, it would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Contact:

Post by OnoSendai » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:21 pm

u = unicode, probably.

MSUdom5
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:04 am
Location: Mississippi, USA
Contact:

Post by MSUdom5 » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:24 pm

OnoSendai wrote:u = unicode, probably.
Ah! I'll try building with unicode support and post an update. Thanks Ono.

MSUdom5
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:04 am
Location: Mississippi, USA
Contact:

Post by MSUdom5 » Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:15 pm

That was it! It works! Thanks Ono.

Grimm, use the --enable-unicode flag during for configure, and rebuild the libraries. The resulting libraries can then replace the old ones, and indigo should run fine.

User avatar
Grimm
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska, USA

Post by Grimm » Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:54 pm

Excellent!! Thank you MSUdom5 and thank you Ono! That worked perfectly.
Grimm

MSUdom5
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:04 am
Location: Mississippi, USA
Contact:

Post by MSUdom5 » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:28 am

Make sure you keep the original libraries though as applications which need 2.4 support won't work (e.g. Audacity).

lolko7
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:44 am

Post by lolko7 » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:07 am

GNUdo wrote:
Indigo not starting because it could not find libtiff.so.4: I had only libtiff.so.3 (couldn't upgrade to libtiff4), solution was to link libtiff.so.4 to libtiff.so.3
SATtva_ wrote:
Indigo is linked with libtiff.so.4, however it is absent on my system (I have the latest version of media-libs/tiff present in the official portage tree installed). There is only libtiff.so.3 which is a symlink of libtiff.so.3.8.2. Creating a symlink libtiff.so.4 to libtiff.so.3.8.2 fixed the problem. Not really a Gentoo-way though.
How this do it ? How create symlink libtiff.so.4 to libtiff.so.3.8.2 ?
My OS is openSUSE 11.1 64bit.

User avatar
SATtva_
1st Place Winner
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 6:44 am
Location: Russia, Siberia
Contact:

Post by SATtva_ » Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:59 am

lolko7, under root do:

Code: Select all

ln -sv /usr/lib32/libtiff.so.3.8.2 /usr/lib32/libtiff.so.4
ln -sv /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.3.8.2 /usr/lib64/libtiff.so.4

User avatar
kikeonline
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 2:47 am
Location: Nicaragua

Re: Indigo 1.1.15

Post by kikeonline » Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:29 am

how can i make it work on Ubuntu 8.10!!


./indigo: error while loading shared libraries: libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

User avatar
SATtva_
1st Place Winner
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 6:44 am
Location: Russia, Siberia
Contact:

Re: Indigo 1.1.15

Post by SATtva_ » Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:50 am

Make sure you have the latest version of wxGTK installed on your system. My version is 2.8.9.1.

User avatar
kikeonline
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 2:47 am
Location: Nicaragua

Re: Indigo 1.1.15

Post by kikeonline » Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:26 pm

I compiled wtGTX-2.8.10 and still doesnt work :(

./indigo: error while loading shared libraries: libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Post Reply
111 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests