Woah that's a mega old version of Indigo, you can't get any of your clients to sponsor you to upgrade to 2.2?

Good idea. Added to the tracker.

@polyman that won't be in version 2.4 sorry.

I just emailed doug and I'll make sure we have a working os x installer available within two weeks. Sorry for the delay mangler!

You need to model the stuff behind the camera as well, since there are shadows on the real image which aren't in your model yet.

We're unable to read the mac address on your system. What network interfaces do you have on that box? Can you post your ipconfig dump here?

We're trying lots of different taglines on the front page of the website - so I thought it was time for another round of:

"What shall we use as the Indigo tagline for this week?"

My offers:

* Take photographs of your models.
* A photographer inside your computer.

This may be solved with IndigoSG. Part of the problem with why we don't make stuff like this available is because it's a bit of a mission to send messages to the indigo rendering process (the xml message passing is ultra robust but also very verbose), when we have a nicer way to interact with the In...

Pibuz - do you have anyone else who could help you with the italian translation? I understand you are very busy and if there are more than one person..

lol neo you're awesome.

The mice are scared of the cheese and have set up a minefield to protect their homes!

We'll have a booth at Technology 2010 this year if anyone in Auckland wants to come down and meet us in person, you can do so for free on the 13th!

Thanks guys. :) I'm trying to get some more presentation slots at different things. As for the 'best renderer in the world', I'm pretty sure we are the best in absolute accuracy and features, and although I too like to be all low-key and subtle - in the marketplace you need to be clearly identified ...

Sounds like an annoying bug to me.

Added to the bugtracker to be fixed in 2.4.