Search  | Login  | Register

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Offline
User avatar
Hi all,
Indigo 1.0.7 has been released:
win 32 bit:
http://www.indigorenderer.com/joomla/in ... &Itemid=62

EDIT:
win 64 bit:
http://www.indigorenderer.com/joomla/in ... &Itemid=62

This release focuses primarily on render quality.
Mitchell Netravali filtering for both splatting and super sample downsizing allows for reasonably sharp images with less aliasing than Gaussian filtering.
I've exposed 'blur' and 'ring' parameters (B and C from the M.N. model).
So you may tweak the parameters to get the kind of look you're after.
I recommend blur = 0.6, ring = 0.2 (this is the Indigo default)

Aperture diffraction may now be done in a filtering stage when the image is tone-mapped. This is called 'post-process diffraction'.
This technique, while not quite as accurate as during-tracing diffraction, can be faster, and will probably result in less noise in the render.


1.0.7
* fixed having to disable bidir for foreground_alpha
* fixed bug with render region complaining about image size
* Using inifile.xml instead of inifile.txt
* made it so that you can specifiy the blur and ring parameters of the MN splat filter.
* different sampling technique for non-circular apertures.
* made downsize filter and splat filter both be specified in similar ways.
* fixed aperture diffraction as a post-process

I'm probably gonna feature freeze until 1.0 stable.
Please point out any bugs.

Splat filter and downsize filter are set like so: (Either in inifile.xml, or in the renderer_settings element)

Code:
<downsize_filter>
   <mn_cubic>
      <ring>0.2</ring>
      <blur>0.6</blur>
   </mn_cubic>
</downsize_filter>


EDIT: attached a couple of images showing the difference between Mitchell Netravali downsize filtering and Gaussian. If you look carefully you can see the false frequencies (aliasing) introduced by the Gaussian filter. This is why you should use M.N. over Gaussian.


Attachments:
ss2_gaussian.png
ss2_gaussian.png [ 277.75 KiB | Viewed 4941 times ]
ss2_mn_cubic.png
ss2_mn_cubic.png [ 254.11 KiB | Viewed 4940 times ]


Last edited by OnoSendai on Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:19 pm, edited 5 times in total.
 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Thanks :D


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Developer
Thank you master Ono!


 Profile  
 
Offline
Thanks, Oh Lord.
How would we go about applying the new glare in post? Can we expect an updated Violet? And if yes, will it also have camera tonemapping added?

EDIT: I mean post-pro aperture diffraction

_________________
http://www.bertrand-benoit.com


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Hi BbB, currently the 'post-process' aperture glare can only be done inside Indigo. I'll think about porting it to Violet :)


 Profile  
 
Offline
Thanks Ono. :D

_________________
http://simonlarsen.deviantart.com/gallery/


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Tnx Ono!!!
Luca. ;)


 Profile  
 
Offline
Thanks Master Ono for the time and effort!

Indigo stopped with an error when I used the downsize_filter... I'll try to figure out why.

-edit- Sorry, never mind, it was an error about bidir and naturally my fault.

_________________
Sander "Roger" Wit
The Netherlands


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Winner
Being able to fine tune Mitchell Netravali is realy cool, are other filter planed too? Seeing Catmul or even a sinc Filter (for resizing) would be nice :)

If you need bugs, just check out the "Bugs and Requests" subforum, there are enough (older) issues that seems to slowly get lost in the Forum :?

_________________
C4D User - My Portfolio
iMac 2x2.8Ghz on Vista64 & AMD 4x3.0Ghz


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Catmul and MN both are simplified sincs. (the sinc function would be infinite, while the other two are cut off, after the first sin-shaped curve. Not sure, which, but I think, the MN function, additionally is slightly deformed to give some more sharpness or something)


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Thank you very much Ono!! :D


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Developer
Thank you Ono!!!

But i have a questions concerning the inifile.xml:

since Max_change, max_ncr, height, width, halt_time and so on are not anymore inside, does indigo use the old defaults if i dont export them to the renderer_settings?


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Hi Fused.
If settings are not specified either in the renderer_settings element, or in inifile.xml, then a default value is used.


 Profile  
 
Offline
ZomB
Yes, there's still this unsolved issue of the weird-looking phongs, isn't there (see 1.0.4 render - Phong IOR 1.4, Exp: 20)?


Attachments:
im1204117398.jpg
im1204117398.jpg [ 41.01 KiB | Viewed 4856 times ]

_________________
http://www.bertrand-benoit.com


Last edited by BbB on Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Winner
Yes BBB check here more more info...

Hmmm.... having a full defined inifile.xml with all defaults would be nice for a quick reference Ono!
The old format was better understandable and also documented a bit, while the new one isn't... :?
But I'm sure there is a big plan behind this ;-)

_________________
C4D User - My Portfolio
iMac 2x2.8Ghz on Vista64 & AMD 4x3.0Ghz


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group