Search  | Login  | Register

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Offline
User avatar
unfortunaly...as i can see the fry render image exept the contrast (i like it)...i think it have more correct shadows in the room....i dont know how much the same is the scenes between renderers.....may be i try and one test my self soon with thees 3 progs!
indigo is far far the clearest of all! :wink:

_________________
1)Core i7 965XE stock CLOCK ,PSU:CHIEFTEC 850W
M/B ASUS P6T DELUXE,WATERCOOLING ZALMAN RESERATOR 2
MEMORY:6GB CORRSAIR @1600,Ati HD 4870x2,
MONITOR:LG 1950SQ,CASE:THERMALTAKE SOPRANO


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
the last image to compare Indigo 0.9.6 Vs maxwell render 1.5 Vs fryrender 1.8......all the image they have been realized whit the same workstation in 32 minutes......whit connection to 3d studio max 9
I leave you the appraisals
filippo

sorry for my poor language


Attachments:
File comment: fryrender(exit portal on)
fryrender exit portal on.jpg
fryrender exit portal on.jpg [ 474.67 KiB | Viewed 4256 times ]

_________________
2x Xeon quad core ghz 2.66(8 core)+4g ram+quadro fx
2 x Xeon Quad 5540 (16 core)+16GB ram+ Nvidia GTX 295 1800mb
 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
the comparison......indigo 0.9.6(exit portal on) Vs Maxwell render 1.5 Vs fryrender 1.8(exit portal on) 32 minutes of render


Attachments:
File comment: ALL IMAGE
TOTALE.jpg
TOTALE.jpg [ 265.14 KiB | Viewed 4253 times ]

_________________
2x Xeon quad core ghz 2.66(8 core)+4g ram+quadro fx
2 x Xeon Quad 5540 (16 core)+16GB ram+ Nvidia GTX 295 1800mb
 Profile  
 
Offline
how are you doing your portal ? is it down as it should and as it is explained in the tutorial ? normals must be facing inward, portal object must be tagged as exit portal either in host application via fry object modifier or in the OBJ tab in main application.


 Profile  
 
Offline
My speed tests, for picture quality comparison.


Attachments:
File comment: fryrender image, 50 mins.
Supersampling ON.

output_002.jpg
output_002.jpg [ 64.61 KiB | Viewed 4181 times ]
File comment: fryrender image, 10 mins.
Supersampling OFF.

output_001.jpg
output_001.jpg [ 65.15 KiB | Viewed 4206 times ]
File comment: fryrender image, 10 mins.
Supersampling ON.

output_001_.jpg
output_001_.jpg [ 78.74 KiB | Viewed 4221 times ]
File comment: This is Indigo PT+BiDir render, 10 mins.
w_mayak_050_vray50night_indigo.max-10mins.jpg
w_mayak_050_vray50night_indigo.max-10mins.jpg [ 132.07 KiB | Viewed 4232 times ]
File comment: This is Indigo PT+BiDir, 50 min. render, crisp and nearly clean! I really like the AA, very detailed render quality!
winner!_mayak_050_vray50night_indigo.max-50min.jpg
winner!_mayak_050_vray50night_indigo.max-50min.jpg [ 85.22 KiB | Viewed 4214 times ]


Last edited by vansan on Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
 Profile  
 
Offline
vansan wrote:
Maxwell 1.5 and Fry beta1.8 sacrificed the sharpness of the render to speed up noise clearing.

Indigo is the best! :)


bluriness has nothing to do with noise cleaning but with AA filtering. Real cameras are a little blurry too, that's why your 8Mpixels photos looks better downsized.

there is a little checkboxe called "S" near the output size. if checked, it enable supersampling. in most cases it's useless and memory hungry so it's off by default. that's all.


 Profile  
 
Offline
Thanks lwan, I appreciate your help.
In earlier beta-versions supersampling was on by default, I just didn't get it :oops:


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
VERY GOOD TEST..
THAKS
FILIPPO

_________________
2x Xeon quad core ghz 2.66(8 core)+4g ram+quadro fx
2 x Xeon Quad 5540 (16 core)+16GB ram+ Nvidia GTX 295 1800mb


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
hmmm... Fry result looks like SanAndreas style :)
nice tests

regards,
Raphael


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
WITH supersampling, fry is quite good :)
But STILL far away from being as sharp as indigo :D
If Indigo gets that fast, it definitely is the winner :D (for now, it might be preference, which means, for me, Indigo already IS the winner :D)


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
Developer
Mesh errors near the door on Indigo image :)
Normal smoothing should be off i think.

Nice test though.


 Profile  
 
Offline
sharpness/blurrines is really just a matter of AA filtering.
fry used to have a whole set of AA filters, including box filtering (very sharp and basic), but we decided that fry should include the fewest settings possible on the rendering process, so that you tweaks settings only if you need them.

BTW, are you sure your camera focus point is OK ? just wondering because the blur here is a little bit stronger than usual.


 Profile  
 
Offline
It's a shame that AA filtering selection is gone.
As for the camera focus - it's OK. Many folks experienced that issue and are very unpleased with it. Some people just can't live without strong AA filters, lol :lol:


 Profile  
 
Offline
User avatar
I prefer indigo than fryrender. I like the indigo result. But fryrender it's more complete, has a great menu with a lot of options, you can config in the menu the lights, cameras, surfaces, etc.. indigo only has a menu in the exporters. If indigo one day would have a menu such as fryrender indigo would be one of the most renders engine.

Sorry for my poor english.


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group