Render (Quality)

Get feedback from others on your works in progress
Post Reply
6 posts • Page 1 of 1
henriquefz
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 2:08 am

Render (Quality)

Post by henriquefz » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:54 pm

Hi everyone, :)

This image has more or less 50 hours to render, perhaps more.

But the 30 hours ago I see no change in the state where it is now

Image
crop 100%

We have got much better results in fewer hours with the indigo in other images so the problem should not be the computer, I think

There are some possibilities of the indigo image fails to improve its quality?

I have used the indigoresumer this has do with the quality of render?

(Sorry poor english) :(

Thanks for any help. :)

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Contact:

Post by OnoSendai » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:11 am

Hi, what's the material used in this scene? Is it glossy transparent?

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Post by PureSpider » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:37 am

I think it's because you're using glossy transparent and a reflecting material with low IOR... they take a lot of time to clear up.

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Post by CTZn » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:45 am

Try without bidir, it's maintaining a certain level of noise in this lightwise complex scene. Eventually set depth lower...
obsolete asset

henriquefz
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 2:08 am

Post by henriquefz » Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:45 am

Hi, :)

Material from glass
Image

should be Specular?

I will also try without Bidirectional

Thanks ;)

Best regards, ;)

StompinTom
Indigo 100
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:33 pm

Post by StompinTom » Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:57 am

thats pretty good if the original is huge (like 4000x3000 and such).

the old tried-n-true method works here as in any case of bad sampling: render it at twice/thrice/quadruple the target resolution and downsample afterwards. :wink:

Post Reply
6 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests