Friday, 2.30 PM

Get feedback from others on your works in progress
User avatar
Macrob
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:55 am

Friday, 2.30 PM

Post by Macrob » Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:47 pm

Hi! I had something different in mind when starting this. But then I liked the chair so much, I had to focus it :)
Attachments
im1189054743.jpg
im1189054743.jpg (72.76 KiB) Viewed 4892 times

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Contact:

Post by OnoSendai » Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:57 pm

Nice, bit much DOF effect I think.

User avatar
Stur
Posts: 594
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:52 pm
Location: Nancy, France

Post by Stur » Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:25 pm

Nooo ! I don't want to go back to school, pleaaaase !!



The chair is nice indeed.
But the room needs more light, I'd be depressed to work in such a dark athmosphere.

User avatar
Camox
2nd Place Winner
Posts: 587
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:28 am
Location: Berlin Germany
Contact:

Post by Camox » Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:28 am

I like the light, looks very real. Nice mats good moddeling great work ! :D

greetz

User avatar
suvakas
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 2613
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Post by suvakas » Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:45 am

Good theme for a render!
I agree with Ono though. Too much dof makes it a bit unrealistic.

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Post by CTZn » Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:54 am

I don't have this sensation, blur occurs really near camera objective, it has to be so ! But ok I'm no photographer :)

A detail: chair's thickness. They are made with a leaf or what ? They should be at least 0.8cm thick imho...
obsolete asset

User avatar
suvakas
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 2613
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Post by suvakas » Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:02 am

CTZn wrote:I don't have this sensation, blur occurs really near camera objective, it has to be so ! But ok I'm no photographer :)
Yes, it's ok for objects in front, but i have a feeling, that everything behind that chair and table are slightly out of focus too. And that feels unrealistic to me.

User avatar
Camox
2nd Place Winner
Posts: 587
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:28 am
Location: Berlin Germany
Contact:

Post by Camox » Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:14 am

I think that is matter of taste, the picture looks very realistically. The DOF settings could be somewhat less, but it is ok. I have photos seen where more dof was. That does not take on the picture to anything realistik.
Into the gallerie please ! :D

User avatar
suvakas
3rd Place Winner
Posts: 2613
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Post by suvakas » Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:48 am

Camox wrote:I think that is matter of taste..
Yeah, of course it is. That's what we're all representing here - our own personal opinion. 8)

User avatar
Macrob
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:55 am

Post by Macrob » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:12 am

I guess you are all right (a little bit :lol: ).
I´ll work on it.
But lesser (?or more?) DOF forces me to give the speaker more details (lazy me :roll: )

I started to simulate an overhead projector and so the classroom was born.
Do we have actually that optical rig competition? A lightsource emitting in only one direction is really hard to achieve. Also I have no complex knowledge of lenses :wink:
Attachments
im1188227727.jpg
im1188227727.jpg (74.19 KiB) Viewed 4744 times

User avatar
Camox
2nd Place Winner
Posts: 587
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:28 am
Location: Berlin Germany
Contact:

Post by Camox » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:15 am

suvakas wrote:
Camox wrote:I think that is matter of taste..
Yeah, of course it is. That's what we're all representing here - our own personal opinion. 8)
Really ? Everybody be cool you be cool. 8)

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Contact:

Post by OnoSendai » Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:39 am

Camox wrote:I think that is matter of taste, the picture looks very realistically. The DOF settings could be somewhat less, but it is ok. I have photos seen where more dof was. That does not take on the picture to anything realistik.
Into the gallerie please ! :D
To some degree it's a matter of taste. But if you're going for a realistic image, there are limits to how much DOF effect you can have - because camera lenses / apertures just don't get that big.

User avatar
Camox
2nd Place Winner
Posts: 587
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:28 am
Location: Berlin Germany
Contact:

Post by Camox » Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:40 am

To some degree it's a matter of taste. But if you're going for a realistic image, there are limits to how much DOF effect you can have - because camera lenses / apertures just don't get that big.
At first sight it has a close degree at realism. dof settings may not be perhaps somewhat strongly however for my eye necessarily unrealistically. it is not perfectly comes however already well near to.
I do not have written it 100% realistically look. In any case one more successfully more render, that is my opinion. :)

I do not hope you understand me wrongly with my bad English.:oops:

greetz :wink:

StompinTom
Indigo 100
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:33 pm

Post by StompinTom » Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:36 am

that DOF would be appropriate for a very fast lens (say, f2 or f1.4, a good prime lens) so i dont see it as a problem. be nice to see a texture on the desks, like a scratch map or something.
more contrast in postpro would look cool.

User avatar
Kram1032
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
Location: Austria near Vienna

Post by Kram1032 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:21 am

great room :D

GREAT OVERHEAD! O.o

can you close up, how you did it? :)

Post Reply
47 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests