Great work with bidir Ono, weighted !

What exactly is it ?

Well I'm using bidir for the dichroic glass tests and it does the job just fine... I assume the changes are positives since these tests are demanding, they involve complex materials... did I say something wrong, or is it because I said something ?

I for once doesn't know exactly what weighted bidir meant

Me neither, but I know it's better if a bug using bidir and complex specular materials was squashed. I won't claim things that I have not tested but right now it's doing great, I was not used to be that confident in bidir's performances with sss.

I would like to know more as well, meanwhile I'm happy with the few results.

I was asking, what exactly is this "incorrect weighting" that got fixed.

So far ive been under the impression it was this:
http://www.indigorenderer.com/joomla/fo ... ight=bidir

wonderfull work...

"Please test and let me know if you find any bugs!"

I can't find bugs , and stable :


http://laszlo-blender.extra.hu/W3D_Korok-kozepkorFinishRender.jpg

( 182 h. - hp550 notebook - celeron cpu )

182 h wow that`s a long time !

btw: nice render ,funny how there because all hang around.

Gush, I'm terrified. O_o I've just tested Windows x86 build and Linux x86-64 build of Indigo 1.1.18. Both were ran on amd64 Linux box (Win32 version under Wine). Here're pure numbers:

Linux:

Win32:

That's roughly 25% difference!

What disturbs me is the beginning of log in windows version:

While in the Linux version it's just

Does SSE optimizations applied at all?

well... noise-wise, they look pretty mutch equal
The splotched are placed differently but else---^^

what is the skindigo version that works with this indigo 1.1.18?

I'm pretty darn sure the 1.1.16 version does.

wonderfull work, love it
the only problem i have is in the setting albedo get an error message but I think thats my fault,

someone can tell me if is there a way to use caustics

congratulations again very nice work.